Skip to main content

A Change of Perspective

Today’s legislators and the public sector in general are often berated for holding back innovation, for delaying the introduction of new products or services and being too slow in revising legislation. In the transport sector, Mobility as a Service (MaaS) is perhaps the ultimate disrupter as it cuts across all travel modes and to make it work will require legislative changes, the cooperation of all transport operators and the release of certain data.
December 11, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
Today’s legislators and the public sector in general are often berated for holding back innovation, for delaying the introduction of new products or services and being too slow in revising legislation. In the transport sector, Mobility as a Service (MaaS) is perhaps the ultimate disrupter as it cuts across all travel modes and to make it work will require legislative changes, the cooperation of all transport operators and the release of certain data.


Yet, as you will read, our MaaS Market Conference was told time and again that resistance to change often comes from within – be that from separated and siloed transport modes, individual transport operators or even commercial operations. But the travelling public does not subscribe to this neatly segregated and isolated world, they just want to move from A to B by the easiest and most convenient way possible – as illustrated by the rise of taxi-hailing apps such as Uber.

With the ‘convenience’ bar now raised, there is no going back. But in todays congested cities not everybody can go everywhere in a taxi or their private car, so public transport has to raise its game to meet peoples’ new expectation levels and the only way to do this is by using multi-modal solutions.

Add to that mix the seemingly endless increase in the urban population and it is clear that ‘business as usual’ is no longer an option for city authorities and national governments. Either transport authorities climb out of their siloes and focus on traveller convenience or they will be side-lined by the new service providers.

Demolishing those siloes now will be disruptive and potentially even painful in the short-term but the resulting organisations will be far better placed to provide for, and administer, the transport systems people want today and will demand tomorrow.

Related Content

  • Financing the US road infrastructure – road user charging?
    February 2, 2012
    In the US, the National Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission's report to Congress will state that a national, distance-based charging is the only long-term solution to the country's infrastructure financing problems. The Commission's Chair, Rob Atkinson, talks to ITS International
  • Cost benefit goes under the microscope
    August 21, 2017
    Conventional cost benefit analysis (CBA) of plans for urban smart mobility initiatives needs serious rethinking, according to a recently-completed European study. The three-year Evidence Project (the Project) emerged in response to concerns about the availability and quality of documented research – including CBA – required to prove that investment in sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs) can be economically beneficial. Covering 22 sectors ranging from electric vehicles to shared spaces, the Project clai
  • How to win over car owners to public transit
    February 16, 2021
    Public transportation agencies need to look at what private sector firms like Amazon and Netflix have offered their customers, argues Bonnie Crawford of Cubic Transportation Systems
  • Sustainable mobility is a vote-winner, insists Polis
    December 4, 2023
    Organisation's annual conference gave its top award to Groningen in the Netherlands