Skip to main content

Be bold on ITS, says Dutch infrastructure minister

The ITS industry must be bold if it is to succeed in helping to solve society’s mobility issues, according to a leading Dutch politician. “If we want to move forwards, we need brains – we also need the balls,” insisted Cora van Nieuwenhuizen, minister, infrastructure & water management. “No guts, no glory.” Investment was also required, she acknowledged, in order to help make transport more efficient, safe and sustainable. “The challenges we face are many,” she said at the official opening of Intertraffic
March 20, 2018 Read time: 2 mins
Dutch Minister Cora with Jacob Bangsgaard, left and Connekt’s Nico Anten

The ITS industry must be bold if it is to succeed in helping to solve society’s mobility issues, according to a leading Dutch politician. “If we want to move forwards, we need brains – we also need the balls,” insisted Cora van Nieuwenhuizen, minister, infrastructure & water management. “No guts, no glory.”

Investment was also required, she acknowledged, in order to help make transport more efficient, safe and sustainable. “The challenges we face are many,” she said at the official opening of Intertraffic 2018.

“Our infrastructure is stretched to the limit.” Fatalities on the road are on the rise, and air quality also remains an issue. Looking forward, infrastructure needs to be ready for the advent of the new generation of connected and autonomous vehicles (C/AV) and this means that telecoms companies need to be more involved in finding solutions.

Moreover, she is a firm advocate for fifth generation mobile networks (5G). “Let me assure you that I will fight for this extra gigabit like a ‘giga-bitch’!” she declared. But there would need to be “clear rules on data use, security and privacy”.

In the Netherlands, she promised that the government would help cities and regions to experiment with smart mobility solutions such as ride-sharing. But above all, there is a need for the authorities to talk to the private sector. “Working together will be crucial,” she concluded. “I am fully committed. I will do my part in policy and regulation. I want 2018 to go down as the year that smart mobility truly took off, from start-up to scale.”

Related Content

  • San Francisco bans facial recognition
    July 23, 2019
    San Francisco has become the first US city to ban facial recognition software – and it is a move which has implications for transit agencies as well as police forces worldwide Big Brother is watching you’, goes the famous saying. Well, not in San Francisco he isn’t. Legislators in the Californian city – home to the tech gold rush and embracers of all things forward-looking – have decided that, after all, there should be limits to technology’s hold over us. By a margin of eight votes to one, the city’s
  • All change at ITS International
    February 9, 2018
    After four and a half interesting years, this will be my last issue as editor of ITS International. Over that time, I have had the privilege to meet and interview some of the ITS sector’s big names, attend most of the industry’s major events and, I hope, pass on some of that information to you, the readers. What has become clear is that the era of public austerity has created in many local and regional authorities, a fear of being accused of ‘wasting taxpayers’ money’. This is preventing them from visiting
  • We know that ITS can reduce road deaths - this is a moral issue
    May 8, 2019
    If you live in one of the world’s poor countries you are three times more likely to die in a road accident than if you live in a richer country. This sobering finding comes from the latest World Health Organisation report on road safety (p41). That simply isn’t good enough. As WHO points out, proven solutions are available to improve the chilling statistics. These include better legislation and strong enforcement, of course, but technology must also be part of the mix. This is an economic issue - but it’s
  • Safety campaigners offer 'GPS' for AVs
    December 11, 2020
    USDoT criticised by lobby groups for 'hands-off approach to hands-free driving'