Skip to main content

Be bold on ITS, says Dutch infrastructure minister

The ITS industry must be bold if it is to succeed in helping to solve society’s mobility issues, according to a leading Dutch politician. “If we want to move forwards, we need brains – we also need the balls,” insisted Cora van Nieuwenhuizen, minister, infrastructure & water management. “No guts, no glory.” Investment was also required, she acknowledged, in order to help make transport more efficient, safe and sustainable. “The challenges we face are many,” she said at the official opening of Intertraffic
March 20, 2018 Read time: 2 mins
Dutch Minister Cora with Jacob Bangsgaard, left and Connekt’s Nico Anten

The ITS industry must be bold if it is to succeed in helping to solve society’s mobility issues, according to a leading Dutch politician. “If we want to move forwards, we need brains – we also need the balls,” insisted Cora van Nieuwenhuizen, minister, infrastructure & water management. “No guts, no glory.”

Investment was also required, she acknowledged, in order to help make transport more efficient, safe and sustainable. “The challenges we face are many,” she said at the official opening of Intertraffic 2018.

“Our infrastructure is stretched to the limit.” Fatalities on the road are on the rise, and air quality also remains an issue. Looking forward, infrastructure needs to be ready for the advent of the new generation of connected and autonomous vehicles (C/AV) and this means that telecoms companies need to be more involved in finding solutions.

Moreover, she is a firm advocate for fifth generation mobile networks (5G). “Let me assure you that I will fight for this extra gigabit like a ‘giga-bitch’!” she declared. But there would need to be “clear rules on data use, security and privacy”.

In the Netherlands, she promised that the government would help cities and regions to experiment with smart mobility solutions such as ride-sharing. But above all, there is a need for the authorities to talk to the private sector. “Working together will be crucial,” she concluded. “I am fully committed. I will do my part in policy and regulation. I want 2018 to go down as the year that smart mobility truly took off, from start-up to scale.”

Related Content

  • Slow moving US road user charging programme
    July 18, 2012
    Bern Grush recently attended the Mileage-Based User Fee Conference in Austin Texas where the fledgling American landscape for Road User Charging is beginning to take shape. When I was a kid I liked to poke sticks into the ants' nests in sidewalk cracks. Ants would scatter in every conceivable direction. They ran in circles, they ran over and through each other. They screamed without logic. I was fascinated.
  • MaaS to replace 2.3bn annual car journeys by 2023, says Juniper
    October 1, 2018
    Mobility as a Service (MaaS) platforms will replace over 2.3 billion urban private car journeys by 2023, according to new research. This compares with 17.6 million globally in 2018. According to the study from Juniper Research, western Europe will account for 83% of global MaaS trips in 2023. Mobility-as-a-Service: Emerging Opportunities, Vendor Strategies & Market Forecasts 2018-2023 says Helsinki, Finland, will lead MaaS implementation, followed by Stockholm, Sweden and Vienna, Austria.
  • European Truck Platooning Challenge gets under way
    April 6, 2016
    Something huge in the field of connected vehicle technology and automated driving, which is grabbing headlines around the world, will arrive here at Intertraffic Amsterdam later today. Dirk-Jan de Bruijn, programme director of the European Truck Platooning Challenge 2016, sets the scene and looks to the future.
  • Road pricing is inevitable – because the ‘user pays’ principle is fair
    June 14, 2018
    We pay for roads through our taxes: the poor pay proportionately more, and effectively subsidise the rich. It would be fairer to accept the ‘user pays’ principle, says Dr John Walker. Road pricing is already used worldwide to combat congestion and pollution, to compensate for falling revenues from fuel duty (‘gas tax’), to provide an alternative (and fairer) means of charging motorists than the 80-year old fuel tax and to improve the efficiency of and expand transport infrastructure. However, it could and s