Skip to main content

Avery Dennison shows new traffic sign printer

The latest traffic sign printer from Avery Dennison will produce CE-certified signs faster and less expensively than those of rivals, claims the company.
April 6, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
Marco van der Linden of Avery Dennison
The latest traffic sign printer from Avery Dennison will produce CE-certified signs faster and less expensively than those of rivals, claims the company.

The machine starts out as a Mutoh Valuejet graphics printer. However, the Japanese manufacturer “has completely optimised it to be used with our sheeting, inks and reflective overlay”, said Marco van der Linden, Avery Dennison’s marketing manager for the product.

With all these modifications, the Valuejet becomes an Avery Dennison-branded TrafficJet, said van der Linden.

“It’s specially designed for spot colours, it is CE-certified, which means the signs it produces can be used anywhere within Europe and it has a warranty for up to 12 years.

“There’s a difference between a graphics printer and something that can print traffic signs, because the latter have a lot more regulations to comply with.”

The TrafficJet complies with these regulations, but its abilities as a graphics printer gives it added capabilities, he said.

Traditionally, traffic signs are printed as a series of hand-mounted layers, which take time and manpower to place. A graphics printer, however, can lay down multiple colours simultaneously. It is also ideally equipped to cope with sequentially-numbered signs, such as those that appear at 100-metre intervals on European roads, where large numbers of signs, identical apart from a couple of digits, need to be produced.

It can also print logos, such as those of local authorities, on to the signs, as well as dates of manufacture that detail the warrant length.

The final benefit of the new machine, said van der Linden, is that it produces signs at around one-third of the cost of rivals: “This is being aimed at small and medium-sized companies. Existing machines are very large and are only bought by large companies.”

Related Content

  • June 15, 2022
    Jenoptik measures out the future
    The speed of tech changes means Jenoptik is redrawing how it sees itself. Adam Hill catches up with Stefan Traeger and Kevin Chevis at Intertraffic Amsterdam to find out more about ‘extended reality’…
  • December 6, 2012
    Debating the future of in-vehicle systems
    Industry experts talk to Jason Barnes about the legislative situation of current and future in-vehicle systems. Articles about technology development can have a tendency to reference Moore’s Law with almost indecent regularity and haste but the fact remains that despite predictions of slow-down or plateauing, the pace remains unrelenting. That juxtaposes with a common tendency within the ITS industry: to concentrate on the technology and assume that much else – legislation, business cases and so on – will m
  • May 7, 2020
    Columbia brings the noise to VRUs
    ‘Twalking’ – the practice of staring at a smartphone screen while walking – may be a matter for wry amusement for the non-addicted, but is potentially hazardous to the phone users. A US research project may have found a solution, finds Alan Dron
  • June 4, 2014
    SCANaCAR and VideoBadge counter parking’s prickly problems.
    Colin Sowman discovers how the latest systems can boost productivity and reduce conflict in parking enforcement. Parking enforcement is something of a ‘Cinderella’ service for local authorities: while necessary to keep the roads open and the traffic flowing, it is an expensive operation and can be loss-making. It is also labour intensive and parking enforcement officers are routinely verbally abused and sometimes physically attacked. Some authorities are now looking to automate parking enforcement in orde