Skip to main content

Autonomous vehicles a double-edged sword?

Welcome to our 20th Anniversary special edition. Over the past two decades ITS International has reported the trials and tribulations of ITS as it has progressively reduced congestion, emissions and journey times and improved road safety. Indeed many believe the sector is currently ‘living the dream’.
June 4, 2015 Read time: 3 mins

Welcome to our 20th Anniversary special edition. Over the past two decades ITS International has reported the trials and tribulations of ITS as it has progressively reduced congestion, emissions and journey times and improved road safety.

Indeed many believe the sector is currently ‘living the dream’.

So is the driverless car, with its promise of eliminating traffic accidents and better utilisation of time, road space and vehicles, the golden future? Possibly, but it’s yet unproven and there could be an alternative scenario.

Those in autonomous vehicles can work during their journey so why bother with multimodal commutes – just sit in an autonomous vehicle. That this would increase congestion and travel times for all road users would be of little concern to those in autonomous vehicles as they are working, but it could lead to wider resentment.

Technically an unoccupied autonomous vehicle could be sent to collect an elderly person from a city centre, or park itself out of town after dropping them off at the doctor’s surgery. But the potential security risks posed by an unoccupied autonomous vehicle delivering a terrorist’s payload to the centre of a city means legislators may not allow unoccupied journeys.

Without unoccupied running there is little reason to believe autonomous vehicles will make a difference in terms of car sharing and ride sharing which are growing in popularity through the efforts of Zipcar, BlaBlaCar and Uber – but not without some commercial resistance.

And while autonomous cars can travel close to the vehicle in front, they can’t defy the laws of physics. So an autonomous vehicle travelling very close behind an unconnected car that runs into the back of a stationary vehicle, is likely to crash too. This can’t happen, so either the gap ahead of the autonomous vehicle will have to remain as-is, or politically divisive dedicated lanes for connected and autonomous vehicles will have to be installed.

Autonomous vehicles will avoid hitting pedestrians and cyclists. Once pedestrians and cyclists know this they will cross the road at will (or play ‘chicken’), further increasing urban journey times.

Over the past two decades and more ITS has usually been deployed to improve travel for all citizens but the autonomous vehicle could challenge that ethos. As traditional vehicles will be around for another two decades, authorities must decide how to balance the potentially conflicting needs of those two sets of motorists - and they don’t have another two decades to make those decisions.

Related Content

  • Global cities transform space for post-Covid transport
    May 7, 2020
    Glimpses are beginning to emerge of how European and US cities plan to change the way people travel.
  • StreetLight Data maps future
    February 20, 2019
    Laura Schewel of StreetLight Data talks to Adam Hill about the importance of measuring what you do – and about how paint will remain perhaps the most important piece of technology in the city planners’ armoury for a decade to come Transportation is dangerous, responsible for 30% of global cargo emissions today. Some experts believe that it will be responsible for 80% by 2050. And that’s before you even get on to the safety question - just ask tech entrepreneur Laura Schewel. “Transportation is getting wo
  • California grants Uber driverless car permit, releases autonomous vehicle regulations
    March 13, 2017
    The California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) has issued Uber with another permit to put its driverless cars back on the state’s roads, according to Reuters. Obtaining the permit also marks a concession for Uber, which had fought California regulators over the requirement and initially refused to apply for the US$150 permit. Following a disagreement with regulators last December when Uber argued that its cars do not meet the state's definition of an autonomous vehicle because they require constant mo
  • Debating a cost-effective means of road user charging
    July 20, 2012
    Does GPS/GNSS-based technology provide a cost-effective means of charging or tolling on a national or international level, or are the issues pertaining to effective enforcement an obstacle. Here, leading equipment manufacturers debate the issue.