Skip to main content

Autonomous vehicles a double-edged sword?

Welcome to our 20th Anniversary special edition. Over the past two decades ITS International has reported the trials and tribulations of ITS as it has progressively reduced congestion, emissions and journey times and improved road safety. Indeed many believe the sector is currently ‘living the dream’.
June 4, 2015 Read time: 3 mins

Welcome to our 20th Anniversary special edition. Over the past two decades ITS International has reported the trials and tribulations of ITS as it has progressively reduced congestion, emissions and journey times and improved road safety.

Indeed many believe the sector is currently ‘living the dream’.

So is the driverless car, with its promise of eliminating traffic accidents and better utilisation of time, road space and vehicles, the golden future? Possibly, but it’s yet unproven and there could be an alternative scenario.

Those in autonomous vehicles can work during their journey so why bother with multimodal commutes – just sit in an autonomous vehicle. That this would increase congestion and travel times for all road users would be of little concern to those in autonomous vehicles as they are working, but it could lead to wider resentment.

Technically an unoccupied autonomous vehicle could be sent to collect an elderly person from a city centre, or park itself out of town after dropping them off at the doctor’s surgery. But the potential security risks posed by an unoccupied autonomous vehicle delivering a terrorist’s payload to the centre of a city means legislators may not allow unoccupied journeys.

Without unoccupied running there is little reason to believe autonomous vehicles will make a difference in terms of car sharing and ride sharing which are growing in popularity through the efforts of Zipcar, BlaBlaCar and Uber – but not without some commercial resistance.

And while autonomous cars can travel close to the vehicle in front, they can’t defy the laws of physics. So an autonomous vehicle travelling very close behind an unconnected car that runs into the back of a stationary vehicle, is likely to crash too. This can’t happen, so either the gap ahead of the autonomous vehicle will have to remain as-is, or politically divisive dedicated lanes for connected and autonomous vehicles will have to be installed.

Autonomous vehicles will avoid hitting pedestrians and cyclists. Once pedestrians and cyclists know this they will cross the road at will (or play ‘chicken’), further increasing urban journey times.

Over the past two decades and more ITS has usually been deployed to improve travel for all citizens but the autonomous vehicle could challenge that ethos. As traditional vehicles will be around for another two decades, authorities must decide how to balance the potentially conflicting needs of those two sets of motorists - and they don’t have another two decades to make those decisions.

Related Content

  • Autonomous driving – what can we really expect?
    June 6, 2016
    Dave Marples of Technolution BV looks beyond the hype to the practical implementation of autonomous vehicles. Having looked at the development of this sector for some time, I am concerned about the current state of autonomous driving development as engineering (and marketing) have run way ahead of the wider systemic, and legislative, requirements to support an autonomous future.
  • DSRC? ‘It’s become a faith-based thing’
    March 2, 2021
    The US FCC’s decision on 5.9GHz led to Applied Information offering DSRC buybacks to DoTs. Bryan Mulligan tells Adam Hill that we now just need to get on and roll out CV technology...
  • HERMES Study provides guidance for forward ITS thinking in Finland
    August 25, 2016
    Having authored HERMES, a major study for the Finnish Ministry of Transport and Communication, Josef Czako talks to ITS International about his findings and lessons for other authorities. When CEOs of major automakers are predicting more change in the next five years than in the past 50, what is the role of national authorities considering the benefits of innovations in ITS?
  • Need for simpler urban tolling solutions
    January 10, 2013
    A common assumption, even amongst informed observers, is that there’s but a handful of urban charging schemes in operation around the world and scant prospect of that changing any time soon. Larger city-sized schemes such as Singapore, London and Stockholm come readily to mind but if we take a wider view and also consider urban access control and Low Emission Zones (LEZs) then the picture changes rather radically. There is a notable concentration of such schemes in Europe but worldwide the number is comfort