Skip to main content

All change at ITS International

After four and a half interesting years, this will be my last issue as editor of ITS International. Over that time, I have had the privilege to meet and interview some of the ITS sector’s big names, attend most of the industry’s major events and, I hope, pass on some of that information to you, the readers. What has become clear is that the era of public austerity has created in many local and regional authorities, a fear of being accused of ‘wasting taxpayers’ money’. This is preventing them from visiting
February 9, 2018 Read time: 2 mins

After four and a half interesting years, this will be my last issue as editor of ITS International. Over that time, I have had the privilege to meet and interview some of the ITS sector’s big names, attend most of the industry’s major events and, I hope, pass on some of that information to you, the readers.

What has become clear is that the era of public austerity has created in many local and regional authorities, a fear of being accused of ‘wasting taxpayers’ money’. This is preventing them from visiting industry events, talking to the experts and undertaking the trials and pilots needed to evaluate and prove the technologies they need.

National governments are stepping in to support pilots, although these tend to favour broad-brush research and every city, town and highway faces different challenges. One-size does not fit all. This leaves many authorities unable to implement the best solution to their problem because it has not been tested by a government-funded scheme and they dare not risk spending on ‘untried’ solutions.

The wider ramification is that much of the current research is following government agendas rather than local needs - the UK government’s announcement of more funding for research into driverless cars is a case in point. While, on a national level, the money may boost employment, the technology it will create could easily lead to gridlocked cities. 

Local, regional and state transport authorities need to find a way to prove the solutions to their own challenges – possibly by working together on projects of mutual interest to share the work, the cost and the perceived risk to taxpayers’ money.  

I leave the editorship of ITS International in the very capable hands of Adam Hill. I look forward to remaining part of Route One’s team, organising the MaaS Market conferences, working on the Show Dailies and attending conferences and events on behalf of the company. I can be contacted at [email protected] and look forward to continuing our dialogue/ hearing from you.

Related Content

  • Mobility pricing offers new tools for managing mobility
    November 23, 2017
    Mobility pricing is the best way of sustaining and enhancing mobility, argues Moving Forward Consulting’s Josef Czako. Mobility pricing (MP) is effectively the culmination of the ‘user pays’ principle and has been referred to in many policy discussions about electronic toll collection, road user charging (RUC), and pricing. MP not only reflects the ‘use more, pay more’ nature of RUC, it also takes account of the external cost of journeys including pollution, noise, the cost of congestion and accidents.
  • Moovit: Gut feelings no match for data
    August 7, 2019
    Cities that bring in mobility services without data might be missing out on areas where demand is highest. Ben Spencer talks to Moovit’s Alon Shantzer about how the company is helping customers to pinpoint the right locations Launching mobility services without taking into account public transportation data can lead to chaos in cities. That’s the view of Alon Shantzer, vice president international sales at Moovit, the Mobility as a Service (MaaS) provider and transit app. “The data we have can define
  • Debating a cost-effective means of road user charging
    July 20, 2012
    Does GPS/GNSS-based technology provide a cost-effective means of charging or tolling on a national or international level, or are the issues pertaining to effective enforcement an obstacle. Here, leading equipment manufacturers debate the issue.
  • Bristol’s buses trial CycleEye detection system
    July 7, 2017
    Fusion Processing’s Jim Hutchinson looks at a two-year trial of the company’s cyclist detection system. Is cycling in a city dangerous? Well, that depends where you are and how you view statistics. Malmö is far more bike-friendly than Mumbai and the risk can either be perceived as small - one death per 29 million miles cycled in the UK in 2013 - or large - that equated to 109 deaths in the same year. Whatever your personal take on the data, the effect of these accidents can be felt indirectly too. News of c