Skip to main content

All change at ITS International

After four and a half interesting years, this will be my last issue as editor of ITS International. Over that time, I have had the privilege to meet and interview some of the ITS sector’s big names, attend most of the industry’s major events and, I hope, pass on some of that information to you, the readers. What has become clear is that the era of public austerity has created in many local and regional authorities, a fear of being accused of ‘wasting taxpayers’ money’. This is preventing them from visiting
February 9, 2018 Read time: 2 mins

After four and a half interesting years, this will be my last issue as editor of ITS International. Over that time, I have had the privilege to meet and interview some of the ITS sector’s big names, attend most of the industry’s major events and, I hope, pass on some of that information to you, the readers.

What has become clear is that the era of public austerity has created in many local and regional authorities, a fear of being accused of ‘wasting taxpayers’ money’. This is preventing them from visiting industry events, talking to the experts and undertaking the trials and pilots needed to evaluate and prove the technologies they need.

National governments are stepping in to support pilots, although these tend to favour broad-brush research and every city, town and highway faces different challenges. One-size does not fit all. This leaves many authorities unable to implement the best solution to their problem because it has not been tested by a government-funded scheme and they dare not risk spending on ‘untried’ solutions.

The wider ramification is that much of the current research is following government agendas rather than local needs - the UK government’s announcement of more funding for research into driverless cars is a case in point. While, on a national level, the money may boost employment, the technology it will create could easily lead to gridlocked cities. 

Local, regional and state transport authorities need to find a way to prove the solutions to their own challenges – possibly by working together on projects of mutual interest to share the work, the cost and the perceived risk to taxpayers’ money.  

I leave the editorship of ITS International in the very capable hands of Adam Hill. I look forward to remaining part of Route One’s team, organising the MaaS Market conferences, working on the Show Dailies and attending conferences and events on behalf of the company. I can be contacted at [email protected] and look forward to continuing our dialogue/ hearing from you.

Related Content

  • Panasonic in Colorado: Rocky mountain way
    December 3, 2018
    Panasonic is at the heart of a C-V2X project which began last year in Colorado. The company’s smart mobility boss Chris Armstrong tells Adam Hill how it is working out Colorado needs traffic and transport solutions – and fast. The US state’s population has grown 50% in the last 20 years and another 50% hike is predicted in the next 20. It also spends more than $13 billion in roadway crash costs each year. In 2015, 546 people died in traffic-related crashes, and more than 3,000 were seriously injured.
  • Effortless mobility for everyone
    September 10, 2021
    To improve the way we move people around, a lot of stakeholders are going to need to start cooperating and aligning, suggests Edwin van den Belt, software architect at Dat.mobility
  • Taking the long view of ITS
    March 24, 2015
    Caroline Visser believes the ITS industry must present a coherent case for consideration of the technology to become part of transport policy and planning. As ITS advisor and road finance director for the International Road Federation (IRF) in Geneva, Caroline Visser is well placed to evaluate quantifying the benefits of ITS implementation – a topic about which there is little agreement and even less consistency. She is pressing to get some consistency in the evaluation of ITS deployments through the use of
  • Avoiding a tangle
    September 4, 2018
    The ITS industry will get into a ‘terrific mess’ if it doesn’t sort out the question of interoperability, says Georg Kapsch. He talks to Alan Dron about data, connectivity – and why governments should stay out of technology issues Governments should set a regulatory framework to help shape the direction of road technologies - but then stand aside and allow industry to create the necessary technologies, according to a European pioneer in the field. Georg Kapsch, CEO of Kapsch Group and Kapsch TrafficCom,