Skip to main content

WSDOT reports on multi-modal transportation

Working closely with partners from Puget Sound-area transit and planning organizations to implement a multimodal-system analysis, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has produced its new Corridor Capacity Report to explain how transportation system efficiency would improve if travellers made better use of available capacity across all modes of transportation. In addition to updates on vehicle miles travelled, state-wide delay and the cost of this delay to Washingtonians, the report
November 29, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
Working closely with partners from Puget Sound-area transit and planning organizations to implement a multimodal-system analysis, the 451 Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has produced its new Corridor Capacity Report to explain how transportation system efficiency would improve if travellers made better use of available capacity across all modes of transportation.

In addition to updates on vehicle miles travelled, state-wide delay and the cost of this delay to Washingtonians, the report provides performance highlights on: transit ridership, reduced vehicle miles travelled due to transit; benefits of corridor-based analysis; ferry capacity and reliability cost of congestion trend; greenhouse gas emissions; and park and ride lot capacity and utilisation.

According to the report, each Washingtonian travelled 8,303 miles 2012, 202 fewer than they did in 2010 and the lowest since 1988. On average, the state’s residents last year spent four hours and 30 minutes delayed in traffic, which translates to US$115 in associated costs per person.

“This multimodal approach is an exciting step forward for WSDOT in analysing comprehensive system performance,” said Daniela Bremmer, WSDOT director of strategic assessment and performance analysis. “This report plays a pivotal role in understanding the impact current multimodal trends have on our schedules, wallets and the environment. It also captures travellers’ experiences in terms of individual trip times and trip reliability – providing a true customer focus.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Smarter transportation infrastructure means smarter choices says IBM
    November 26, 2013
    Last month’s Economic Development Vitality Initiative forum, co-sponsored by IBM, identified strong infrastructure, including intelligent transportation systems (ITS) as highlighted by panellist Scott Belcher, CEO of ITS America, as essential. The key to ensuring the sustainability and resilience of our critical transportation infrastructure, in the end, comes down to encouraging the right choices. Data collected by industry, government and academia over the past several decades shows a clear correlation
  • Metro focuses on pavement data 
    December 2, 2021
    Washington State agency says CommonPaths supports pedestrian and accessibility projects 
  • SCATS study shows significant savings
    December 16, 2013
    Australian study quantifies the benefits of SCATS to the motorists, the environment and the economy. Opportunity weekday cost savings potential of some AUD16 million (US$15.2 million) has emerged from rigorous analysis of a one-day study of Australia’s Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic System (SCATS) in operation. This represents 27% of the total cost of a real alternative semi-adaptive traffic control. The estimated indicative annual weekday-based value is AUD3,900 million (US$3,705 million) or 0.9% of t
  • ITS advancement lays beyond benefit-cost analysis
    May 29, 2013
    Shelley Row, former Director of the US Department of Transportation’s ITS Joint Program Office, gives her views on the way forward for the industry. We, as intelligent transportation system (ITS) proponents and engineers, tend to be overly fixated on benefit-cost data. We want decisions to be made on logical grounds for which benefit-cost calculations are optimal. While benefit-cost data is necessary, it is not always sufficient. We can learn from our history where we see three broad groups of ITS deploymen