Skip to main content

Visible road markings: an essential for older drivers and intelligent vehicles

The RAINVISION project, co-financed by the European Commission, recently held its final meeting. Over the past three years, the project has researched the impact of road markings on driver behaviour under different night weather conditions (dry, wet and wet and rainy) and has assessed how different age groups and gender groups adapt their driving based on the above mentioned conditions. The results of the project were presented and in particular, the outcomes of three different trials conducted over the pro
March 20, 2015 Read time: 3 mins
The RAINVISION project, co-financed by the 1690 European Commission, recently held its final meeting. Over the past three years, the project has researched the impact of road markings on driver behaviour under different night weather conditions (dry, wet and wet and rainy) and has assessed how different age groups and gender groups adapt their driving based on the above mentioned conditions.

The results of the project were presented and in particular, the outcomes of three different trials conducted over the project period.

A driving simulator test in France investigated the influence of road markings on drivers’ errors (involuntary run-off-the-road and lane departures) under wet and rainy night conditions. On a simulated rural road combining straight sections and curves, 40 per cent less driving errors were observed with wet-night visible road markings compared to standard markings. The biggest gap was observed for elderly drivers.

The results of the second trial, a track test in Austria reinforced these findings and also showed that, under adverse driving conditions, driving task could be performed better when high-performance marking material was used. Older drivers in particular seemed to benefit from wet-night visible markings, as clearness and perceptibility of the driving trajectory increased when such materials were used.

The on-road trials were carried out in the UK in cooperation the city of Durham.  Working with project partners and traffic police, ten high accident sites were identified and high-performance marking materials were applied on these selected locations. The results of the analysis showed that, on average, those high-performance markings did not lead to an increase of speed.  At the same time, accidents had increased over the same period, although an analysis of police records could not link any of the accidents to the presence of better markings.
The meeting also examined how road markings can help maximise the safety benefits of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) in the intelligent vehicle.  Systems such as Lane Departure Warning and Lane Keeping Assist, that prevent drivers from head-on collisions and run-off accidents, will become more commonplace in the years to come and in this sense, it is important that markings can remain visible to tap into the significant safety gains that can arise from these new technologies.

Given that reductions in road fatalities become disproportionately harder as the road safety figures improve, all participants agreed that the introduction of ADAS technologies, in cooperation with core infrastructure elements such as road markings, could make a difference in the years to come.  In this sense, there was a consensus on the need for further research in the field, i.e. field operational tests, to better understand how the interaction of infrastructure and ADAS can work optimally to save lives and prevent injuries.

Some initial research work conducted under the auspices of EuroRAP under the Road that Cars can Read initiative found that road markings should have a minimum retroreflectivity of 150 mcd/m2/lux under dry weather conditions (R3) and 35 mcd/m2/lux under wet and rainy conditions, if they are to remain visible for the driver and the intelligent vehicle at all times. In the opinion of ERF, all A-roads within the EU should comply with this specification by March 2018.

Related Content

  • July 7, 2017
    Bristol’s buses trial CycleEye detection system
    Fusion Processing’s Jim Hutchinson looks at a two-year trial of the company’s cyclist detection system. Is cycling in a city dangerous? Well, that depends where you are and how you view statistics. Malmö is far more bike-friendly than Mumbai and the risk can either be perceived as small - one death per 29 million miles cycled in the UK in 2013 - or large - that equated to 109 deaths in the same year. Whatever your personal take on the data, the effect of these accidents can be felt indirectly too. News of c
  • December 3, 2012
    Study reveals in-car devices aid positive changes to driver behaviour
    The results of a four-year study by the Field Operational Tests of Aftermarket and Nomadic devices in Vehicles (TeleFOT) Consortium were presented at a recent conference in Brussels. The study focused on the assessment of the impact of driver support functions provided by in-vehicle aftermarket and nomadic devices on driving and driver behaviour. Coordinated by the Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT) and with a budget of US$19.5 million, the four-year TeleFOT project is one of the biggest traffic IC
  • May 8, 2015
    Data holds the key to combating VRU casualties
    Accident analysis software can help authorities identify common causes and make best use of their budgets, as Will Baron explains. More than 1.2 million people die on the world’s roads each year and according to the World Health Organisation, half of these are pedestrians and vulnerable road users (those whose vehicle does not have a protective shell, such as motorcyclists and cyclists). While much has been done to improve road safety and cut the number of deaths and serious injuries on our roads, a great d
  • August 29, 2019
    Don’t drive drunk – or use a hands-free phone
    Despite law changes, drivers’ bad habits have been creeping back in. TRL’s Dr Shaun Helman tells Adam Hill why using a phone at the wheel is just as distracting as driving after a few drinks esearch from as far back as 2002 (see box) suggests that driving while making a phone call – either hands-free or holding a handset to your ear – creates the same amount of distraction as being drunk behind the wheel. While it is notoriously hard to predict how alcohol will affect an individual (due to the speed of