Skip to main content

USDoT Intersection Safety Challenge moves to next level

Derq & Miovision among organisations through to next round of competition
By Adam Hill January 9, 2025 Read time: 2 mins
(© Andrii Biletskyi | Dreamstime.com)

Derq and Miovision are among the companies, universities and other organisations which have won through to the latest, $4m, stage of the US Department of Transportation (USDoT)'s Intersection Safety Challenge.

The awards for Stage 1B of the multi-stage prize competition - System Assessment and Virtual Testing - were announced at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting in Washington, DC: 10 teams will be given amounts ranging from $166,666 to $750,000, for a total of $4m in prize awards. 

The challenge supports the US National Roadway Safety Strategy (NRSS) and was set up to encourage teams of innovators and end users to develop, prototype and test intersection safety systems which use emerging technologies including AI and machine learning.

In Stage 1A, the winning teams each received $100,000 for proposing their concepts. In Stage 1B, they had to demonstrate the technical aspects of their safety systems by identifying vehicles and people moving on the road - both inside and outside of a vehicle - and predicting potential collisions using real-world scenarios.

Their challenges included sensor fusion, classification, path and conflict prediction using USDoT's real-world sensor data collected on a closed course at the Federal Highway Administration Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center.

In this round, Tier 1 winners get $750,000 each: these are Derq USA; plus the universities of Michigan, California (Los Angeles) and Hawaii.

The University of Michigan team includes Mcity, General Motors Global R&D, Ouster and Texas A&M University.

Tier 2 winners get $166,666 each: Orion Robotics; Florida A&M University and Florida State University; University of Washington; University of California (Riverside); Ohio State University; and Miovision, which includes Miovision USA, Carnegie Mellon University, Amazon Web Services and Telus.

These systems are set to identify and mitigate unsafe conditions involving vehicles and vulnerable road users at roadway intersections - and the next stage is for prototyping and field-testing.

USDoT principal deputy assistant secretary for research and chief scientist Dr. Robert C. Hampshire, says: "Enhancing the safety of vulnerable road users at our nation’s roadway intersections is a critically important element in driving down fatalities on our roads to zero.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Report analyses multiple ITS projects to highlight cost and benefits
    March 16, 2015
    Every year in America cost benefit analysis is carried out on dozens of ITS installations and pilot studies and the findings, along with the lessons learned, are entered into the Department of Transportation’s (USDOT’s) web-based ITS Knowledge Resources database. This database holds more than 1,600 reports and periodically the USDOT reviews the material on file to draw conclusions from this wider body of evidence. It has just published one such review ITS Benefits, Costs, and Lessons Learned: 2014 Update Re
  • Traffic sensors give cyclists green lights
    February 1, 2013
    Transport officials in Columbus, Ohio, are following in the footsteps of Austin, Texas; Portland, Oregon and Berkeley, California and recalibrating their traffic signal sensors to accommodate the growing number of cyclists in the city. Nearly all the city’s 1,000 traffic lights are connected to road sensors that detect the presence of vehicles at the intersections and adjust the lights accordingly. Cycles are another story; they don’t contain enough metal to trigger the sensor. This has caused some cyclis
  • Lidar: beginning to see the light
    March 14, 2022
    Lidar feels like a technology whose time has come – but why now? Adam Hill talks to manufacturers, vendors and system integrators in the sector to assess the state of play and to find out what comes next
  • Stronger penalties needed for texting drivers says IAM
    September 18, 2013
    Drivers convicted of causing death by dangerous driving should be given stronger and more consistent penalties, according to road safety charity the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM). An IAM analysis of eleven recent prosecutions involving mobile and smartphone use revealed that the average sentence for causing death by dangerous driving is four-and-a-half years in prison and a disqualification from driving for seven years. In all of the cases analysed, the convicted drivers were found to have lost the