Skip to main content

US to unify regulations on cell-phone use at the wheel?

A new bill being presented in the US may ban the use of cell-phones by drivers while at the wheel. Should this bill go ahead, it would unify actions in a number of states under a single law that applies to the entire country. The move, called the Safe Drivers Act, is seen crucial to plans to tackle distracted driving.
April 19, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
RSSA new bill being presented in the US may ban the use of cell-phones by drivers while at the wheel. Should this bill go ahead, it would unify actions in a number of states under a single law that applies to the entire country. The move, called the Safe Drivers Act, is seen crucial to plans to tackle distracted driving.

Various studies in the US and Europe show that cell-phone use while driving can increase the risk of an accident by a factor of four. This poses more of a risk than when a driver is just over the legal limit for alcohol levels in the blood stream when at the wheel. Young drivers are particularly likely to use cell-phones while driving to make calls, check messages and use other applications according to research carried out in the US and Europe.

The proposed Safe Drivers Act would ban people from holding cell-phones while at the wheel, although the use of hands-free devices would still be permitted under the new rules and which would be written by the Department of Transportation (DoT). The bill proposes that the DoT carry out a study within two-years to investigate further the risks posed by drivers talking on the phone while at the wheel, which may have implications for the use of hands-free devices in the future. This bill follows on from measures by US Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood to tackle distracted driving, which is thought to be a major cause of road accidents in the US and Europe, as well as elsewhere in the world.

Related Content

  • High level support for US DOT decision on vehicle to vehicle technology
    February 4, 2014
    The US Department of Transportation's (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is to begin taking steps to enable vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communication technology for light vehicles. This technology would improve safety by allowing vehicles to communicate with each other and ultimately avoid many crashes altogether by exchanging basic safety data, such as speed and position, ten times per second. DOT research indicates that safety applications using V2V technology can address a large
  • Taking it to the streets
    November 30, 2012
    The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI) and US Department of Transportation (USDOT) have launched the Connected Vehicle Safety Pilot Model Deployment in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The largest connected vehicle test undertaken, and a critical next step in the development of vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communication. The pilot, a $22 million partnership between UMTRI and USDOT, is part of a joint research initiative led by the National Highway Traffic
  • Will standardisation increase ITS interoperability?
    February 1, 2012
    Theoretical balance Kallistratos Dionelis, secretary general of ASECAP, comments on the European Commission's new ICT Standardisation Work Programme. I've just read a proposal from the European Commission on the 2010-2013 ICT Standardisation Work Programme. As ASECAP Secretary General this is one of my responsibilities. I work to receive information, to disseminate information and to build bridges and mutual understanding between policy-makers and the industrial world, between ASECAP and others.
  • Autonomous vehicles, smart cities: moving beyond the hype
    February 21, 2018
    There is a lot of excited chatter about autonomous vehicles – but 2getthere’s Robbert Lohmann suggests we might need to take a step back and look realistically at what is achievable. You might be surprised that the chief commercial officer of a company delivering autonomous vehicles would begin an article with the suggestion that we need to get past the hype. And yet I do; because we have to, and urgently so. The hype prevents the development of autonomous vehicles that address actual transit needs. And