Skip to main content

US to unify regulations on cell-phone use at the wheel?

A new bill being presented in the US may ban the use of cell-phones by drivers while at the wheel. Should this bill go ahead, it would unify actions in a number of states under a single law that applies to the entire country. The move, called the Safe Drivers Act, is seen crucial to plans to tackle distracted driving.
April 19, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
RSSA new bill being presented in the US may ban the use of cell-phones by drivers while at the wheel. Should this bill go ahead, it would unify actions in a number of states under a single law that applies to the entire country. The move, called the Safe Drivers Act, is seen crucial to plans to tackle distracted driving.

Various studies in the US and Europe show that cell-phone use while driving can increase the risk of an accident by a factor of four. This poses more of a risk than when a driver is just over the legal limit for alcohol levels in the blood stream when at the wheel. Young drivers are particularly likely to use cell-phones while driving to make calls, check messages and use other applications according to research carried out in the US and Europe.

The proposed Safe Drivers Act would ban people from holding cell-phones while at the wheel, although the use of hands-free devices would still be permitted under the new rules and which would be written by the Department of Transportation (DoT). The bill proposes that the DoT carry out a study within two-years to investigate further the risks posed by drivers talking on the phone while at the wheel, which may have implications for the use of hands-free devices in the future. This bill follows on from measures by US Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood to tackle distracted driving, which is thought to be a major cause of road accidents in the US and Europe, as well as elsewhere in the world.

Related Content

  • Prowag signals change to vision statement
    February 15, 2024
    New pedestrian signal requirements designed to make crossings safer for the visually impaired mean that accessible signals are no longer just an option for US cities and municipalities. They now have the backing of the law, explains Andrew Stone
  • Canadian authorities convinced of enforcement safety benefits
    November 28, 2012
    Cost-benefit analysis invariably finds highly in favour of speed and red light enforcement, particularly so in Edmonton in the Alberta province of Canada, where authorities need no convincing of the merits of road safety engineering. Justification of enforcement efforts on economic grounds has been reinforced this year, by a study of the costs and benefits of red light enforcement. New York-based economic research firm John Dunham & Associates carried out this latest analysis for American Traffic Solutions
  • Safety first in the Big Apple
    August 19, 2022
    For a variety of reasons, seniors are particularly vulnerable to traffic violence – but better road design can help. Adam Hill examines New York City’s new plan to keep older people from becoming collision statistics
  • ANPR shockwaves emanate from Royston ruling
    October 7, 2013
    Colin Sowman looks at how a ruling regarding ANPR cameras in a small English town could have wide-reaching implications. Superficially it was an easy decision: the local council and traders wanted, and were prepared to fund, automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) cameras installed to deter crime in Royston, a small town (population 17,000) in rural England.