Skip to main content

US states raise gas tax as concern grows over transportation funding

As the US congress continues to debate the impending shortfall in transportation funding, several states have implemented increases in state gas taxes. New Hampshire’s levy went up four cents per gallon and Maryland’s increased by a half of a penny per gallon. Indiana, meanwhile, switched from a flat rate to a percentage of the monthly gasoline price average in the state. Infrastructure advocates have pushed lawmakers to increase the federal gas tax for the first time in 21 years as the Department of
July 4, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
As the 2018 US Congress continues to debate the impending shortfall in transportation funding, several states have implemented increases in state gas taxes.

New Hampshire’s levy went up four cents per gallon and Maryland’s increased by a half of a penny per gallon. Indiana, meanwhile, switched from a flat rate to a percentage of the monthly gasoline price average in the state.

Infrastructure advocates have pushed lawmakers to increase the federal gas tax for the first time in 21 years as the Department of Transportation said this week that it would soon begin cutting back on infrastructure reimbursements to states.

The gas tax, which is currently priced at 18.4 cents per gallon, has been the traditional source of funding for the Highway Trust Fund, which is set to run out of money in August. The gas tax only brings in approximately US$34 billion per year, however, and current transportation funding is closer to US$50 billion a year.

Lawmakers are struggling to come up with a way to close the approximately US$16 billion-per-year shortfall before the Highway Trust Fund goes bankrupt.

A bipartisan pair of senators proposed last month that the tax be increased by 12 cents over the next two years to help make up the transportation funding difference. But lawmakers in both chambers have largely been reluctant to increase taxes in the middle of an election year.

Transportation advocates have pointed to states that have increased their gas taxes to argue that a federal hike would be more politically viable than most observers believe.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Healthy prospects for floating vehicle data systems
    February 3, 2012
    Elmar Brockfeld, Alexander Sohr and Peter Wagner from the German Aerospace Center's Institute of Transport Systems look at the prospects for floating vehicle data systems. Although Floating Vehicle Data (FVD) or probe vehicle fleets have been around for about a decade, the idea behind them is of course much older: from probe vehicles that flow with the traffic it should be possible to get a precise, fast and spatially near-complete picture of the prevailing traffic flow conditions in an area under surveilla
  • IRF World Congress 2024: road user charging is the future
    October 16, 2024
    Environmental emergency has put transport at the heart of policymakers’ agendas
  • Development banks pledge US$175 billion for clean transport
    June 21, 2012
    Eight of the world’s largest multilateral development banks (MDBs) banks yesterday pledged to invest US$175 billion over the next 10 years to support sustainable transport in developing countries. The pledge was made at the UN Sustainable Development Conference in Rio de Janeiro (Rio+20) by the African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, CAF- Development Bank of Latin America, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, European Investment Bank, Inter-American Development Bank, Islamic Developme
  • Need for secure approach to connected vehicle technology
    January 7, 2013
    Accidental or malicious issue of false messages to connected vehicles could result in dire consequences, so secure systems of authentication and certification are likely to be necessary, write Paul Avery and Sandra Dykes. Connectivity among vehicles in urban traffic systems will provide opportunity for beneficial impacts such as congestion reduction and greater safety. However, it also creates security risks with the potential for targeted disruption. Security algorithms, protocols and procedures must take