Skip to main content

US states raise gas tax as concern grows over transportation funding

As the US congress continues to debate the impending shortfall in transportation funding, several states have implemented increases in state gas taxes. New Hampshire’s levy went up four cents per gallon and Maryland’s increased by a half of a penny per gallon. Indiana, meanwhile, switched from a flat rate to a percentage of the monthly gasoline price average in the state. Infrastructure advocates have pushed lawmakers to increase the federal gas tax for the first time in 21 years as the Department of
July 4, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
As the 2018 US Congress continues to debate the impending shortfall in transportation funding, several states have implemented increases in state gas taxes.

New Hampshire’s levy went up four cents per gallon and Maryland’s increased by a half of a penny per gallon. Indiana, meanwhile, switched from a flat rate to a percentage of the monthly gasoline price average in the state.

Infrastructure advocates have pushed lawmakers to increase the federal gas tax for the first time in 21 years as the Department of Transportation said this week that it would soon begin cutting back on infrastructure reimbursements to states.

The gas tax, which is currently priced at 18.4 cents per gallon, has been the traditional source of funding for the Highway Trust Fund, which is set to run out of money in August. The gas tax only brings in approximately US$34 billion per year, however, and current transportation funding is closer to US$50 billion a year.

Lawmakers are struggling to come up with a way to close the approximately US$16 billion-per-year shortfall before the Highway Trust Fund goes bankrupt.

A bipartisan pair of senators proposed last month that the tax be increased by 12 cents over the next two years to help make up the transportation funding difference. But lawmakers in both chambers have largely been reluctant to increase taxes in the middle of an election year.

Transportation advocates have pointed to states that have increased their gas taxes to argue that a federal hike would be more politically viable than most observers believe.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Priority for safety and interoperability, need for DSRC
    July 18, 2012
    Justin McNew, Chief Technology Officer, Kapsch TrafficCom Inc., USA offers his opinion of where 5.9GHz DSRC technology will head in the coming years. The debate ranges back and forth over the most suitable technological solution for future tolling and charging in the US. However, the coming trend is common cooperative infrastructure: instrumented roads and vehicles with the capacity to communicate with each other over all manner of safety, mobility and traveller applications, many of which will involve fina
  • Reflecting on five years of important ITS progress
    January 7, 2013
    Former head of the ITS Joint Program Office Shelley Row has passed the baton to a new director. Now working as an independent consultant, here she reflects on her five years at the helm of the JPO and what the future may hold for ITS in the US. During a mid-morning in Paris earlier this year, having just landed, I decided to take a trip on the city’s subway (Paris’ underground metro) into the city centre. A family with a small boy – about nine years old – boarded the same train. They were American and we st
  • Vendor's eye view of US economic stimulus programme
    March 12, 2012
    Pete Goldin explores the impact of the US economic stimulus programme on the ITS industry from the ITS vendor perspective
  • Monitoring and transparency preserve enforcement's reputation
    July 30, 2012
    What can be done to preserve automated enforcement's reputation in the face of media and public criticism? Here, system manufacturers and suppliers talk about what they think are the most appropriate business models. Recent events in Italy only served to once again to push automated enforcement into the media spotlight. At the heart of the matter were the numerous alleged instances of local authorities and their contract suppliers of enforcement services colluding to illegally shorten amber signal phase tim