Skip to main content

US speed limit increases ‘cause 33,000 deaths in 20 years’

A new Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) study, which looked at the impact of speed limit increases in 41 states over a 20-year period starting in 1993, shows that increases in speed limits over two decades have cost 33,000 lives in the US In 2013 alone. The increases resulted in 1,900 additional deaths, essentially cancelling out the number of lives saved by frontal airbags that year. "Although fatality rates fell during the study period, they would have been much lower if not for states' dec
April 14, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
A new Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) study, which looked at the impact of speed limit increases in 41 states over a 20-year period starting in 1993, shows that increases in speed limits over two decades have cost 33,000 lives in the US. In 2013 alone, the increases resulted in 1,900 additional deaths, essentially cancelling out the number of lives saved by frontal airbags that year.

"Although fatality rates fell during the study period, they would have been much lower if not for states' decisions to raise speed limits," says Charles Farmer, IIHS vice president for research and statistical services and the author of the study.

Farmer looked at deaths per billion miles travelled by state and roadway type. He then considered factors like alcohol consumption, changes in unemployment and the number of young drivers aged 16-24, all of which could affect the fatality rate. Overall, he found that the number of deaths climbed 4 percent with each 5 mph increase in the maximum speed limit.

Maximum speed limits are set by the states and they have been rising since 1995. However, during most of the 1970s and 1980s, the threat of financial penalties held state speed limits to 55 mph.

Today, six states have 80 mph limits, and drivers in Texas can legally drive at 85 mph on some roads.

As large a number as it is, 33,000 is likely an underestimate, Farmer says, as he only considered increases in the maximum speed limit, which often applies only to rural interstates, but many states also increased speed limits on urban interstates. Other states increased speed limits on one section of road and later extended the higher limit to other sections. Those subsequent changes weren't factored in.

"Since 2013, speeds have only become more extreme, and the trend shows no sign of abating," Farmer notes. "We hope state lawmakers will keep in mind the deadly consequences of higher speeds when they consider raising limits."

Related Content

  • January 17, 2025
    Surewise calls for mobility scooter update to Highway Code
    'Unacceptable' that users are not already termed VRUs, insurer says
  • April 20, 2012
    California traffic deaths drop for fifth consecutive year
    California saw a decline in overall traffic deaths for the fifth year in a row. According to federal government figures, total vehicle fatalities dropped 11.9 per cent, from 3,081 in 2009 to 2,715 in 2010. Since the latest high of 4,333 in 2005, the 2010 figures show a total decline of 37.3 per cent.
  • August 29, 2019
    Don’t drive drunk – or use a hands-free phone
    Despite law changes, drivers’ bad habits have been creeping back in. TRL’s Dr Shaun Helman tells Adam Hill why using a phone at the wheel is just as distracting as driving after a few drinks esearch from as far back as 2002 (see box) suggests that driving while making a phone call – either hands-free or holding a handset to your ear – creates the same amount of distraction as being drunk behind the wheel. While it is notoriously hard to predict how alcohol will affect an individual (due to the speed of
  • October 13, 2015
    Corruption corrodes confidence as ITS battles to improve safety
    News items and articles in this issue illustrate the highs and lows of ITS and the dilemma inherent in enforcement application. An IIHS report showing that speed cameras change motorists' behaviour beyond the immediate vicinity of the installations is further evidence of the positive influence the technology can have, however the guilty plea in the Chicago red light corruption case serves to undermine the entire concept.