Skip to main content

US fuel economy for light duty vehicles 2022-2025 ‘will reduce consumption and emissions’

According to researchers at the University of Michigan, the 2022-2025 fuel-economy (CAFE) standards for light-duty vehicles, which were reaffirmed by the EPA on 30 November 2016 in the midterm evaluation of the standards, will substantially reduce future fuel consumption and emissions, even if the future vehicle mix (cars vs light trucks) does not change. However, in addition to these direct benefits, indirect benefits can also be expected via the influence of more stringent standards on the future mix o
December 16, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
According to researchers at the University of Michigan, the 2022-2025 fuel-economy (CAFE) standards for light-duty vehicles, which were reaffirmed by the EPA on 30 November 2016 in the midterm evaluation of the standards, will substantially reduce future fuel consumption and emissions, even if the future vehicle mix (cars vs light trucks) does not change.

However, in addition to these direct benefits, indirect benefits can also be expected via the influence of more stringent standards on the future mix of vehicles produced (and sold). For example, more stringent standards will likely increase pressure on automobile manufacturers to produce (and sell) vehicles with high fuel efficiency and thus increase marketing efforts (incentives, production goals, etc.) for cars (and especially small cars), which tend to be the most fuel-efficient gasoline- and diesel-powered vehicles for sale today. Thus, it is reasonable to postulate that the vehicle mix under the 2022-2025 standards will contain proportionally more cars and less light trucks than would have been the case without these standards in place. In turn, proportionally more cars among new vehicles would indirectly reduce the fuel consumption by the new-vehicle fleet.

This brief report calculated the amount of fuel consumed by different production mixes of cars and light trucks. The calculations were performed for one- and four-year periods. The results indicate, for example, that if the production mix were to stay the same as the model year 2015 mix of 57.4 per cent cars and 42.6 per cent light trucks, compared to a possible mix of 40 per cent cars and 60 per cent light trucks without the new 2022-2025 standards, the fuel saved by the new vehicles during the first four years would amount to 3.3 billion gallons of fuel.

Related Content

  • Intelligent transportation system (ITS) market worth US$63.66 Billion by 2022
    July 15, 2016
    According to a new market research report, Intelligent Transportation System Market by Roadway (Hardware, Software, & Services), Aviation Tool (Kiosk, Multi-User Flight Information Display, and Smart Gate System), Railway, Maritime, Protocol, Application, and Geography - Global Forecast to 2022", published by MarketsandMarkets, the ITS market size, in terms of value, is expected to grow from US436.10 billion in 2015 to US$63.66 billion by 2022, at a CAGR of 8.3 per cent between 2016 and 2022. The major g
  • Sustainable mobility model
    January 27, 2012
    It is only in the last couple of years that the viability of all-electric vehicles for day to day transport has begun to be recognised. Back in 2000, that was not the case, certainly in Italy, where a few pilot projects involving EVs were carried out with negative results. It is against this background, that the innovative Reggio Emilia eco-rental experience must be assessed.
  • Sustainable mobility model
    February 6, 2012
    It is only in the last couple of years that the viability of all-electric vehicles for day to day transport has begun to be recognised. Back in 2000, that was not the case, certainly in Italy, where a few pilot projects involving EVs were carried out with negative results. It is against this background, that the innovative Reggio Emilia eco-rental experience must be assessed.
  • Aptiv: we need overhaul of AV nervous system
    August 20, 2019
    Autonomous vehicles are changing a lot of things: Aptiv’s Christian Schäfer suggests that we need to look again at traditional approaches to vehicle architecture to find viable options for the future