Skip to main content

US fuel economy for light duty vehicles 2022-2025 ‘will reduce consumption and emissions’

According to researchers at the University of Michigan, the 2022-2025 fuel-economy (CAFE) standards for light-duty vehicles, which were reaffirmed by the EPA on 30 November 2016 in the midterm evaluation of the standards, will substantially reduce future fuel consumption and emissions, even if the future vehicle mix (cars vs light trucks) does not change. However, in addition to these direct benefits, indirect benefits can also be expected via the influence of more stringent standards on the future mix o
December 16, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
According to researchers at the University of Michigan, the 2022-2025 fuel-economy (CAFE) standards for light-duty vehicles, which were reaffirmed by the EPA on 30 November 2016 in the midterm evaluation of the standards, will substantially reduce future fuel consumption and emissions, even if the future vehicle mix (cars vs light trucks) does not change.

However, in addition to these direct benefits, indirect benefits can also be expected via the influence of more stringent standards on the future mix of vehicles produced (and sold). For example, more stringent standards will likely increase pressure on automobile manufacturers to produce (and sell) vehicles with high fuel efficiency and thus increase marketing efforts (incentives, production goals, etc.) for cars (and especially small cars), which tend to be the most fuel-efficient gasoline- and diesel-powered vehicles for sale today. Thus, it is reasonable to postulate that the vehicle mix under the 2022-2025 standards will contain proportionally more cars and less light trucks than would have been the case without these standards in place. In turn, proportionally more cars among new vehicles would indirectly reduce the fuel consumption by the new-vehicle fleet.

This brief report calculated the amount of fuel consumed by different production mixes of cars and light trucks. The calculations were performed for one- and four-year periods. The results indicate, for example, that if the production mix were to stay the same as the model year 2015 mix of 57.4 per cent cars and 42.6 per cent light trucks, compared to a possible mix of 40 per cent cars and 60 per cent light trucks without the new 2022-2025 standards, the fuel saved by the new vehicles during the first four years would amount to 3.3 billion gallons of fuel.

Related Content

  • May 16, 2018
    ACE report: private sector and user-pay for English roads
    It’s one minute to midnight for funding England’s roads, according to a timely new report - and the clock’s big hand is pointing to some form of user-pay solution, reports David Arminas. Is there any way out of future user-pay funding for England’s highway infrastructure? The answer is a resounding ‘no’, according to the recently-published report Funding Roads for the Future. The 25-page document by the London-based Association for Consultancy and Engineering (ACE) calls for a radical rethink about how to
  • May 23, 2012
    Civil engineers find fuel savings where the rubber meets the road
    A new study by civil engineers at MIT shows that using stiffer pavements on America’s roads could reduce vehicle fuel consumption by as much as three per cent, that could add up to 273 million barrels of crude oil per year, or US$15.6 billion at today’s oil prices. This would result in an accompanying annual decrease in CO2 emissions of 46.5 million metric tons.
  • January 18, 2023
    Tolling Matters: Getting the balance right
    The concept of road usage charging (RUC) is slowly coming to the fore. But it isn’t just a question of good fiscal sense – it’s about promoting equity and ensuring sustainability too, says Scott Jacobs of Emovis
  • May 18, 2012
    Johnson Controls says US consumers are interested in start-stop systems
    New consumer research conducted by Johnson Controls claims that 97 per cent of Americans are ready for new start-stop technology that improves the fuel economy of their vehicle. The research was conducted to gain understanding of how consumers view fuel-saving power train technologies based on attributes such as purchase price, fuel economy, annual fuel cost and performance. Focus groups across US major metropolitan areas, along with 1,200 survey respondents, provided feedback on efficient vehicle technolog