Skip to main content

US fuel economy for light duty vehicles 2022-2025 ‘will reduce consumption and emissions’

According to researchers at the University of Michigan, the 2022-2025 fuel-economy (CAFE) standards for light-duty vehicles, which were reaffirmed by the EPA on 30 November 2016 in the midterm evaluation of the standards, will substantially reduce future fuel consumption and emissions, even if the future vehicle mix (cars vs light trucks) does not change. However, in addition to these direct benefits, indirect benefits can also be expected via the influence of more stringent standards on the future mix o
December 16, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
According to researchers at the University of Michigan, the 2022-2025 fuel-economy (CAFE) standards for light-duty vehicles, which were reaffirmed by the EPA on 30 November 2016 in the midterm evaluation of the standards, will substantially reduce future fuel consumption and emissions, even if the future vehicle mix (cars vs light trucks) does not change.

However, in addition to these direct benefits, indirect benefits can also be expected via the influence of more stringent standards on the future mix of vehicles produced (and sold). For example, more stringent standards will likely increase pressure on automobile manufacturers to produce (and sell) vehicles with high fuel efficiency and thus increase marketing efforts (incentives, production goals, etc.) for cars (and especially small cars), which tend to be the most fuel-efficient gasoline- and diesel-powered vehicles for sale today. Thus, it is reasonable to postulate that the vehicle mix under the 2022-2025 standards will contain proportionally more cars and less light trucks than would have been the case without these standards in place. In turn, proportionally more cars among new vehicles would indirectly reduce the fuel consumption by the new-vehicle fleet.

This brief report calculated the amount of fuel consumed by different production mixes of cars and light trucks. The calculations were performed for one- and four-year periods. The results indicate, for example, that if the production mix were to stay the same as the model year 2015 mix of 57.4 per cent cars and 42.6 per cent light trucks, compared to a possible mix of 40 per cent cars and 60 per cent light trucks without the new 2022-2025 standards, the fuel saved by the new vehicles during the first four years would amount to 3.3 billion gallons of fuel.

Related Content

  • Progress on speeding ‘may be hampered by confusion on 20mph limits’
    July 5, 2017
    The percentages of vehicles exceeding the speed limit in free flow conditions on UK roads have declined slightly for most vehicle and road types between 2011 and 2016, according to statistics published by the Department for Transport.
  • Flexibility, interoperability is key to future traffic management
    February 3, 2012
    Jon Taylor of Faber Maunsell and Tabatha Bailey of Transport for London describe how an unusual mix of traffic practitioners, researchers and industry are working together to build new tools for the future. As we face higher expectations for managing congestion from both citizens and politicians, and as more and more data is becoming available from new sources, our traffic management challenge is changing.
  • Semi-automated trucks take to European roads
    March 16, 2016
    Early next month six European truck manufacturers will bring platoons of semi-automated trucks to public roads, crossing borders from various European cities in order to reach their final destination of the Port of Rotterdam on 6 April. The overall objective of this European Truck Platooning Challenge is to accelerate the introduction of truck platoons by putting the subject high on the agenda of EU policy makers. The Platooning Challenge, organised by the Netherlands as part of its ongoing EU Presidency
  • Peter Norton: ‘We can reintroduce freedom of choice in transportation’
    April 22, 2022
    Funding for transit, cycling and walkability can be politically divisive – so why not bypass politics by letting toll payers themselves choose how a fraction of their toll is spent, asks Peter Norton