Skip to main content

US fuel economy for light duty vehicles 2022-2025 ‘will reduce consumption and emissions’

According to researchers at the University of Michigan, the 2022-2025 fuel-economy (CAFE) standards for light-duty vehicles, which were reaffirmed by the EPA on 30 November 2016 in the midterm evaluation of the standards, will substantially reduce future fuel consumption and emissions, even if the future vehicle mix (cars vs light trucks) does not change. However, in addition to these direct benefits, indirect benefits can also be expected via the influence of more stringent standards on the future mix o
December 16, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
According to researchers at the University of Michigan, the 2022-2025 fuel-economy (CAFE) standards for light-duty vehicles, which were reaffirmed by the EPA on 30 November 2016 in the midterm evaluation of the standards, will substantially reduce future fuel consumption and emissions, even if the future vehicle mix (cars vs light trucks) does not change.

However, in addition to these direct benefits, indirect benefits can also be expected via the influence of more stringent standards on the future mix of vehicles produced (and sold). For example, more stringent standards will likely increase pressure on automobile manufacturers to produce (and sell) vehicles with high fuel efficiency and thus increase marketing efforts (incentives, production goals, etc.) for cars (and especially small cars), which tend to be the most fuel-efficient gasoline- and diesel-powered vehicles for sale today. Thus, it is reasonable to postulate that the vehicle mix under the 2022-2025 standards will contain proportionally more cars and less light trucks than would have been the case without these standards in place. In turn, proportionally more cars among new vehicles would indirectly reduce the fuel consumption by the new-vehicle fleet.

This brief report calculated the amount of fuel consumed by different production mixes of cars and light trucks. The calculations were performed for one- and four-year periods. The results indicate, for example, that if the production mix were to stay the same as the model year 2015 mix of 57.4 per cent cars and 42.6 per cent light trucks, compared to a possible mix of 40 per cent cars and 60 per cent light trucks without the new 2022-2025 standards, the fuel saved by the new vehicles during the first four years would amount to 3.3 billion gallons of fuel.

Related Content

  • EBRD supports Kazakhstan railway improvements
    December 20, 2013
    The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) is supporting Kazakhstan Temir Zholy (KTZ), the national railways company, in its drive to radically improve energy efficiency across its operations. A US$40 million loan, US$700,000 of which will be provided by the Clean Technology Fund, will finance a series of new technologies to reduce energy consumption, from an upgraded lighting system to alternative heating solutions such as heat pumps, solar water heaters and boiler upgrades. The progra
  • The need for a higher voltage power net for vehicles
    June 27, 2012
    Electrification of the automobile is not limited to the electric vehicles (EVs). As a new report from Frost & Sullivan points out, conventional cars of today are partly electric in their own way, with most systems in the vehicle having electrical and electronic connections for better functionality. Certain high-end vehicles possess more than 90 electronic control units (ECUs) to control the various modules within the car, making the car both sophisticated and complicated. However, added functions such as el
  • Foundation funds research for informed campaigning
    April 29, 2015
    ITS International talks to Professor Stephen Glaister, director of the transport research and lobbying organisation, the RAC Foundation. It is through the eyes of an economist that Professor Stephen Glaister, emeritus professor of transport and infrastructure at Imperial College London and director of the RAC Foundation, views current and future transport problems. Having spent 30 years at the London School of Economics and another 10 at Imperial, the move to the RAC Foundation was a radical departure from
  • Mobility itself is moving says cubic
    June 9, 2015
    Cubic’s Chris Bax looks at the challenges and benefits of implementing transport as a service. Imagine paying for travel in exactly the same way you buy your phone service. For example, you would pay a set amount in exchange for a monthly travel package covering up to 100km of free taxi journeys in your home city (including a guaranteed 15 minute pickup) and public transport usage within a 1,500km radius of your home. Not only would this option be cheaper than owning and maintaining your own car, you would