Skip to main content

US drivers receptive to usage-based auto insurance

US drivers are predominantly open-minded to purchasing usage-based auto insurance (UBI) policies, or pay as you drive insurance, according to a new survey by professional services company Towers Watson. The survey results are a clear indication that UBI is gaining momentum in the marketplace, with more consumers willing to let insurers monitor their driving habits with a telematics device in exchange for potential savings on their car insurance. Most (79 per cent) respondents to the UBI Consumer Survey
September 5, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
US drivers are predominantly open-minded to purchasing usage-based auto insurance (UBI) policies, or pay as you drive insurance, according to a new survey by professional services company Towers Watson. The survey results are a clear indication that UBI is gaining momentum in the marketplace, with more consumers willing to let insurers monitor their driving habits with a telematics device in exchange for potential savings on their car insurance.

Most (79 per cent) respondents to the UBI Consumer Survey indicated they either would buy a UBI policy or are willing to consider the concept, and if insurers would guarantee drivers’ premiums would not rise, that percentage increased to 89 per cent. Interest in UBI programs was highest among younger drivers (18- to 34-year-olds) with approximately two-thirds (66 per cent) saying they would definitely or probably purchase a UBI policy. Roughly half (54 per cent) of the participants who drive every day showed a strong interest in UBI.

The survey looked beyond pricing benefits associated with UBI products to gauge consumers’ interest in various value-added services that can be enabled by the technology underlying UBI devices. Drivers indicated a telling interest in a number of these services, and 72 per cent of those interested in UBI said they would be willing to pay for them. Drivers showed most interest in vehicle theft tracking, automated emergency response, and vehicle wellness reports.

Notably, 60 per cent of those interested in UBI programs said they would be willing to change their driving behaviour. This was highest among younger drivers, who represent the largest risk segment. When asked how they might change their driving behaviour if a UBI device were to be installed in their car, respondents listed sticking to the speed limit, keeping a safer distance from other vehicles and driving more considerately as the leading adjustments.

Related Content

  • Zuora: MaaS comes to the masses
    April 28, 2020
    The shift from ownership to usership in the subscription economy provides opportunities for the whole of the mobility sector for the next decade and beyond, says John Phillips of Zuora
  • New Yorkers and Californians ready for autonomous cars – Volvo survey
    July 8, 2016
    A Volvo Cars survey of 50,000 global drivers found that nine out of ten New Yorkers and 86 per cent of residents in California feel that autonomous cars could make life easier. The survey, Future of Driving survey, indicated that residents of Pennsylvania, Illinois and Texas are less convinced than the average consumer about the safety benefits of autonomous driving. Only about half of Illinois respondents would trust an autonomous car to make decisions about safety, ten per cent less than the national a
  • Report highlights community impact of new mobility options
    March 29, 2018
    Local authorities and communities must understand the impacts of the new mobility options and regulate to get the transport systems they want, according to a new report. Colin Sowman takes a look. Outside of the big cities plagued with congestion, the existing transportation system(s) often cope adequately, and the ongoing workload (maintenance, safety…) is more than enough to keep local transport authorities busy. Is it, therefore, a good use of public service employees’ time to keep abreast of the raft
  • Report highlights community impact of new mobility options
    March 29, 2018
    Local authorities and communities must understand the impacts of the new mobility options and regulate to get the transport systems they want, according to a new report. Colin Sowman takes a look. Outside of the big cities plagued with congestion, the existing transportation system(s) often cope adequately, and the ongoing workload (maintenance, safety…) is more than enough to keep local transport authorities busy. Is it, therefore, a good use of public service employees’ time to keep abreast of the raft