Skip to main content

US congresswoman: ‘We must re-envision transportation’

Arousing call from Capitol Hill to the ITS industry was among the highlights of Day 2 at the ITS America Annual Meeting in Washington, DC. In a keynote speech, congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) said: “So, my friends, your sector has come to the forefront of what we need to be doing in transport and infrastructure today.” She urged delegates to visit members of the House of Representatives to talk about new mobility solutions. “When it comes to transport, Congress could use some intelligence!” sh
June 7, 2019 Read time: 2 mins

Arousing call from Capitol Hill to the ITS industry was among the highlights of Day 2 at the ITS America Annual Meeting in Washington, DC. In a keynote speech, congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) said: “So, my friends, your sector has come to the forefront of what we need to be doing in transport and infrastructure today.”

She urged delegates to visit members of the House of Representatives to talk about new mobility solutions. “When it comes to transport, Congress could use some intelligence!” she joked.

Holmes Norton, a member of the Congress Committee for Transportation and Infrastructure, talked about the importance of the new Transportation Bill which is due in 2020. “These bills are bipartisan,” she pointed out. “There are no Republican roads and Democratic highways.”

But she warned: “This is one bill you can’t write without money.”

Concepts such as Mobility on Demand, microtransit and the importance of the 5.9GHz band “are straightforward issues to the ITS community”. However, Holmes Norton added, “too many members of Congress see these as issues of the future. She is convinced that something radical is required: “Nothing less than a re-envisioning of surface transportation is necessary when we write this new bill.”

She says that the US is “woefully behind” when it comes to funding existing infrastructure – in fact, the American Society of Engineers predicts a deficit of $2 trillion over the next decade. Issues such as climate change must also be at the centre of future transport planning, she concluded.

Related Content

  • November 6, 2015
    Support for US transportation bill
    The Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS America) and the Teamsters have given their support to the Surface Transportation Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2015 (the STRR Act), which was overwhelmingly approved by the US House of Representatives after three days of debate. The bipartisan, multi-year surface transportation bill to reauthorise and reform federal highway, transit, and highway safety programs helps improve US surface transportation infrastructure, refocuses programs on address
  • May 24, 2018
    ITSA Detroit 2018: a must-attend transportation event!
    The 2018 ITS America Annual Meeting Detroit, from 4-7 June, is the must-attend transportation technology event in North America this year. The theme of the meeting, “Transportation 2.0,” will be weaved throughout the three days of plenary sessions, demonstrations, and exhibits. Discussions will centre around the future of transportation, intelligent mobility, and managing risk. “Changes happening today will fundamentally affect how people interact with transportation in the months and years ahead,” said Sh
  • January 9, 2018
    Making the most of Michigan
    Michigan DoT’s Kirk Steudle takes time out from the ITS World Congress in Montreal to talk to Colin Sowman. Thirty years ago, a professional engineer named Kirk Steudle joined Michigan Department of Transportation (MDoT). Today he’s the state transportation director, responsible for more than 16,000km (10,000 miles) of state highways (including 4,000 bridges), some 2,500 employees and a budget of more than $4 billion. We caught up with Steudle during the ITS World Congress in Montreal and asked how he
  • April 16, 2019
    C-ITS in the EU: ‘It has got a little tribal recently’
    As the C-ITS Delegated Act begins its journey through the European policy maze, Adam Hill looks at who is expecting what from this proposed framework for connected vehicles – and why some people are insisting that the lawmakers are already getting things wrong