Skip to main content

US Automated Vehicle Framework to 'slash red tape'

NHTSA insists safety will be prioritised and 'unnecessary' regulation removed
By Adam Hill May 7, 2025 Read time: 3 mins
Automated Vehicle Exemption Program - previously open only to imported AVs - will now include US-produced vehicles (© Daniil Peshkov | Dreamstime.com)

Removing regulatory barriers is at the heart of US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)'s new Automated Vehicle (AV) Framework.

"The new framework will unleash American ingenuity, maintain key safety standards, and prevent a harmful patchwork of state laws and regulations," says a statement from US Department of Transportation.

US secretary of transportation Sean Duffy says the country is "in a race with China to out-innovate, and the stakes couldn’t be higher".

“As part of DoT's innovation agenda, our new framework will slash red tape and move us closer to a single national standard that spurs innovation and prioritises safety," he added.

NHTSA’s AV Framework has three principles:  

  • Prioritise safety in AV operations on public roads
  • 'Unleash innovation' by removing unnecessary red tape
  • Enable commercial deployment of AVs 

NHTSA's Standing General Order on Crash Reporting for vehicles equipped with certain advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and automated driving systems (ADS) will remain, but will be streamlined "to sharpen the focus on critical safety information while removing unnecessary and duplicative requirements".

The agency will also expand the Automated Vehicle Exemption Program - previously open only to imported AVs - to include US-produced vehicles.  

“By streamlining the SGO for Crash Reporting and expanding an existing exemption programme to domestic vehicles, we are enabling AV manufacturers to develop faster and spend less time on unnecessary process, while still advancing safety,” said NHTSA chief counsel Peter Simshauser. “These are the first steps toward making America a more welcoming environment for the next generation of automotive technology."

In a separate move, Duffy announced that USDoT has "terminated seven woke university grants totaling $54 million". 

“The previous administration turned the Department of Transportation into the Department of Woke," said Duffy. 

USDoT says the university grants which have been cancelled are:

University of California, Davis - National Center for Sustainable Transportation 
$12m for “accelerating equitable decarbonisation” research. 

City College of New York - Center for Social and Economic Mobility for People and Communities through Transportation 
About $9m for “equitable transportation for the disadvantaged workforce” research. 

University of Southern California - Pacific Southwest Region University Transportation Center 
About $9m for research on how “the transportation system creates and perpetuates inequities". 

New York University - Connected Communities for Smart Mobility Toward Accessible and Resilient Transportation for Equitably Reducing Congestion 
$6m for “e-bikes to low-income travellers in transit deserts” research. 

San Jose State University - Mineta Consortium for Emerging, Efficient, and Safe Transportation 
About $6m for research on “intermodal inequities, particularly how improvements to auto travel can benefit higher income, often white drivers, while depressing transit ridership potential and depriving it of revenues necessary to provide comprehensive services to lower income, often Bipoc people and research into using crowdsourcing and collaborative planning to address safety concerns of women and gender non-conforming people using public transportation".

University of New Orleans - Center for Transit Oriented Communities 
$6m for “equitable transit-oriented communities [and] how neighborhood stabilisation efforts support environmental justice” research. 

Johns Hopkins University - Center for Smart Transportation 
$6m for research on “hyperlocal pollution exposure inequalities in New York City, promoting EV usage for low-income gig workers, long distance ride sharing, gentrification” and making climate change the centre of transportation decisions. 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • GridMatrix goes back to the future in New York City
    September 25, 2023
    Legacy traffic management infrastructure doesn’t have to be a marker of the past: software upgrades can bring it into the present in a cost-effective and timely way, says Gordon Feller
  • US cities form OMF to develop digital mobility tools
    July 5, 2019
    A group of US cities have formed the Open Mobility Foundation (OMF) to develop and govern digital mobility tools aimed at improving how cities manage transportation. Growing from a collaboration between the Los Angeles Department of Transportation and the city of Santa Monica, the OMF intends to bring together academic and municipal stakeholders to develop the technology. Eric Garcetti, Los Angeles mayor, says: “The OMF will help us manage emerging transportation infrastructures, and make mobility more a
  • USDOT expands real-time travel information with US$2.6 million in grants
    February 25, 2015
    The US Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has announced $2.571 million in grants to expand the use of real-time travel information in 13 highly congested urban areas across ten states. Known as integrated corridor management, or ICM, the grants will help selected cities or regions combine numerous information technologies and real-time travel information from highway, rail and transit operations. Such tools can help engineers make better decisions about congestion managemen
  • Stepping up the fight against road deaths
    October 23, 2015
    The International Transport Forum (ITF) has welcomed the target to “halve the number of global deaths and injuries from road traffic accidents by 2020” set by world leaders in September at the UN Sustainable Development Summit in New York. Every year, almost 1.3 million people are killed in road crashes around the globe, according to the World Health Organization (WHO).