Skip to main content

UK’S infrastructure on the up, but now it’s all about delivery – CBI/AECOM

Almost half of firms believe the UK’s infrastructure has improved over the past five years, but only a quarter think it will pick up in the next five years, and two thirds suspect it will hamper the country’s international competitiveness in the coming decades, according to the 2016 CBI/AECOM Infrastructure Survey.
November 7, 2016 Read time: 2 mins

Almost half of firms believe the UK’s infrastructure has improved over the past five years, but only a quarter think it will pick up in the next five years, and two thirds suspect it will hamper the country’s international competitiveness in the coming decades, according to the 2016 CBI/3525 AECOM Infrastructure Survey.

Delivery of key projects already in the pipeline emerged as the top priority among the 728 firms surveyed. Delivery of IS$47 billion (£38 billion) of investment in the rail network through Control Period 5 and US$18.5 billion (£15 billion) of investment in the UK’s motorways and A-roads through the Road Investment Strategy rank highly, as does delivery of a new runway in the South East  and HS2.

The Government’s recent track record has encouraged firms. Infrastructure has become a core part of the country’s long-term economic agenda since 2010, and 42 per cent of firms see the policies undertaken since the start of the 2015 Parliament , like the creation of Transport for the North, as positive steps.

However, confidence that overall infrastructure will improve in the coming five years has fallen 16 percentage points since the 2015 Survey. A significant majority of firms are not optimistic that infrastructure in aviation, energy and roads will improve, with only digital bucking the trend (59 per cent of companies expect improvements in this area). Moreover, the majority of firms feel the UK is unlikely to be more internationally competitive in 2050 than it is now, and almost half are dissatisfied with the current state of their local infrastructure.

To secure delivery of the most important projects, business group the Confederation for British Industry and infrastructure services firm, AECOM, want to see the Government reaffirm spending plans and press ahead with implementing policy decisions to ensure projects are delivered in full over the course of this Parliament.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • UK firms challenged to cut freight emissions
    September 22, 2017
    UK companies are urged to compete for up to US$20 million (£15 million) of funding to develop technology to reduce harmful emissions from freight. Roads Minister Jesse Norman has called on businesses to lead research into low emission technology for lorries, as well as cars and vans. The projects could see materials which make vehicles lighter, or improve the efficiency of engines or batteries, he says.
  • Weigh in Motion gets smarter
    January 4, 2023
    Weigh in Motion technology is at the forefront of protecting road surfaces and helping enforcement activity – but could it also play a key role in the development of Smart Cities?
  • Canada invests in Vancouver’s EV charging infrastructure
    February 15, 2019
    The government of Canada is investing CAN$300,000 in the construction of six electric vehicle (EV) fast chargers in Vancouver. This funding is part of the government’s CAN$182.5m investment to develop a fast-charging network for EVs and establish natural gas stations along roads and hydrogen stations in metropolitan areas. The chargers are partially funded through the Electric Vehicle and Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Deployment Initiative, a programme which falls under Canada’s $180 billion Inves
  • Danish study shows higher speed limits are safer
    February 25, 2014
    A two-year experiment by the Danish road directorate shows accidents have fallen on single-carriageway rural roads and motorways where the speed limit was raised. Since the speed limit on some stretches of two-way rural roads was increased from 80 to 90 km/h, accidents have decreased due to a reduction in the speed differential between the slowest and fastest cars, resulting in less overtaking. The slowest drivers have increased their speeds, but the fastest 15 per cent drive one km/h slower on average