Skip to main content

UK reviews MaaS, data and micromobility regulation

Mobility as a Service (MaaS), transport data and micromobility are to be the subject of new regulatory review by the UK government. Zero-emission vehicles, driverless vehicles (AVs) and drones are already under similar review. But in a document, Future of Mobility: Urban Strategy, maps out how the country’s Department of Transport will approach other mobility opportunities – and challenges. “This is the moment to reflect on what we as a society want these changes to deliver and what we want our urban
March 27, 2019 Read time: 2 mins

Mobility as a Service (8356 MaaS), transport data and micromobility are to be the subject of new regulatory review by the UK government.

Zero-emission vehicles, driverless vehicles (AVs) and drones are already under similar review. But in a  document, %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 link-external Future of Mobility: Urban Strategy false https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/786654/future-of-mobility-strategy.pdf false false%>, maps out how the country’s Department of Transport will approach other mobility opportunities – and challenges.

“This is the moment to reflect on what we as a society want these changes to deliver and what we want our urban spaces to be like,” the report’s preamble says. “If successfully channelled, they have the potential to deliver step-change advances for society, the environment and the economy.”

The flipside of this is also spelled out: “If technological changes are not effectively managed they could have undesired effects, such as increasing congestion or reducing sustainable travel.”

Transport minister Jesse Norman says that mobility changes are going to be felt most strongly in cities, at least initially, but pledges: “We will be setting out our thinking on the future of rural mobility in due course.”

The government has several principles which it insists will underpin its approach “as far as possible”. These include the tenets that “walking, cycling and active travel must remain the best options for short urban journeys” and “new mobility services must lead the transition to zero emissions”.

Among the government’s pledges are for four ‘future mobility zones’ with £90 million of funding and to encourage “the sharing and harnessing of data, through the creation of standards and platforms that make it easier to access and use transport data”.

Related Content

  • Uber bolsters app features to boost micromobility
    October 1, 2019
    Uber is combining its ride-hailing and food delivery apps, while polishing its green credentials and launching a range of new features and partnerships. There is a particular focus on micromobility: bikes and scooters will be displayed on the map inside the ride-hailing giant’s app in 28 cities to make it easier for users to view their options. The company is also expanding its in-app Transit option to include San Francisco, Mexico City and Paris. New Uber Jump bikes and scooters will come with batteries
  • Lime and rivals form Nordic Micromobility Association
    August 29, 2019
    Lime and its competitors Tier and Voi have formed the Nordic Micromobility Association to promote safety standards for electric scooters. The association will seek to strengthen relationships between Nordic cities and micromobility businesses as well as reduce emissions. Earlier this year, Voi announced its plans to launch e-scooters in Lisbon as part of a wider ambition to expand in Europe. The association’s members are not the only companies working to improve the safety of e-scooters. Last ye
  • Majority of Brits do not think AVs will reduce accidents, says Axa
    December 3, 2018
    Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error. In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians. Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in mo
  • Majority of Brits do not think AVs will reduce accidents, says Axa
    December 3, 2018
    Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error. In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians. Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in mo