Skip to main content

UK councils to get power to enforce moving traffic offences

Local authorities in the UK are set to get the power to fine motorists for moving traffic offences. Control over the issuing of fines is set to move from the police, to local councils, should the proposals be approved next year. Currently, London boroughs are able to fine motorists for similar offences, while councils outside of London can only fine motorists over parking violations or for driving in bus lanes. However under the new plans, councils across the country will gain the power to issue fines fo
December 21, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
Local authorities in the UK are set to get the power to fine motorists for moving traffic offences. Control over the issuing of fines is set to move from the police, to local councils, should the proposals be approved next year.

Currently, London boroughs are able to fine motorists for similar offences, while councils outside of London can only fine motorists over parking violations or for driving in bus lanes. However under the new plans, councils across the country will gain the power to issue fines for moving traffic offences.

According to the Daily Mail, the fines could provide councils with a significant rise in income, with a single yellow box junction camera in Fulham pocketing £12million over seven years, for example. A box junction in Hackney is the second biggest earner, raising £1.2million in fines in the last 18 months, while the Berkeley Street junction in Piccadilly saw £816,000 worth of PCNs issued in the same period.

AA president Edmund King told The Sun: “The real problem is that once local authorities get the powers and start pulling the cash, they get addicted. They get dependent on the cash and even when flaws in their traffic management are revealed they have no desire to change it as the cash will dry up.”

Amanda Stretton, motoring editor at comparison website confused.com said, “If councils are permitted to use cameras to fine people for box junction offences, they should concentrate on investing the money raised into improving congestion flow and management, ultimately saving motorists money.”

Related Content

  • Former Redflex CEO pleads guilty to corruption in Chicago’s red-light camera contracts
    August 21, 2015
    The former chief executive officer of Chicago’s first red-light camera vendor has pleaded guilty to a federal bribery charge. As the CEO of Redflex Traffic Systems, Karen Finley funnelled cash and other personal financial benefits to City of Chicago official John Bills and his friend Martin O’Malley, knowing that the payments would help persuade the city to award red-light camera contracts to Redflex, according to a plea agreement. The benefits included golf trips, hotels and meals, as well as hiring th
  • Transport and traffic management for major sporting events
    February 2, 2012
    Maurizio Tomassini, Isis, and Monica Giannini, Pluservice, detail the STADIUM project, which is intended to provide those responsible for planning major international events with a blueprint for success
  • Southampton City Council deploys Videalert mobile enforcement vehicle
    October 13, 2016
    Southampton City Council has taken delivery of a new Videalert mobile enforcement vehicle, which supports multiple traffic enforcement and community safety applications simultaneously and will be used in conjunction with Videalert’s hosted digital video platform that was recently installed as part of a project to introduce CCTV enforcement of bus lanes in key areas of the city. The vehicle will patrol the city, targeting vehicles that stop unlawfully on the keep clear areas outside schools in response t
  • The red light camera choice: 60 killed or save US$231 million a year
    June 5, 2015
    David Crawford investigates new cost-benefit analysis of red light cameras. US states can now realistically calculate the economic benefits of using red light safety cameras, alone or in combination with other measures, to cut road traffic accident levels. The results could be of material value in making the case for the cameras as a number of state legislatures continue to debate their acceptability.