Skip to main content

UK commuters spend up to six times as much of their salary on rail fares as other European passengers

Rail commuters returning to work this week will face fresh fare increases, while spending up to six times as much of their salary on rail fares as European passengers on publicly owned railways, new research by the Action for Rail campaign has revealed. UK workers on average salaries will spend 14 per cent of their income on a monthly season ticket from Luton to London (£387), or 11 per cent from Liverpool to Manchester (£292). By contrast, similar commutes would cost passengers only two per cent of t
January 3, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
Rail commuters returning to work this week will face fresh fare increases, while spending up to six times as much of their salary on rail fares as European passengers on publicly owned railways, new research by the Action for Rail campaign has revealed.

UK workers on average salaries will spend 14 per cent of their income on a monthly season ticket from Luton to London (£387), or 11 per cent from Liverpool to Manchester (£292).

By contrast, similar commutes would cost passengers only two per cent of their income in France (£61), three per cent in Germany (£85) and Italy (£61) and four per cent in Spain (£75).

The analysis also shows that rail fares have increased by 56 per cent since 2006, more than double the change in average earnings (24 per cent) and inflation (26 per cent).

Action for Rail, a campaign by rail unions and the TUC, point to the UK’s privatised rail service as a key driver of costs. All other countries examined have largely publicly-owned rail services and lower costs for commuters.

The findings come as rail campaigners and workers plan to hold protests at over 100 stations around the country against fare rises and in support of public ownership.

According to national trade union TUC general secretary Frances O’Grady, years of failed privatisation has resulted in high ticket prices, overcrowded trains, understaffed services and out-of-date infrastructure.

General secretary of train drivers’ union ASLEF Mick Whelan called it scandalous that the UK government allows privatised train companies to make even more money for providing an ever-poorer service. He said the UK has the most expensive railway in Europe and the train companies are about to make it even more costly for people to travel. General secretary of the Transport Salaried Staffs' Association, Manuel Cortes said money made from the railways should be ploughed back into cheaper fares and service upgrades for the benefit of passengers.

Related Content

  • Birmingham CAZ is green for go
    July 26, 2021
    For urban authorities worldwide, the health of residents is racing up the political agenda. Ben Spencer looks at how one city - Birmingham, UK - has established its own Clean Air Zone and is investing in alternative-fuel vehicles and public transport incentives
  • Managed lanes – the riddle wrapped up in an enigma
    December 15, 2014
    Managed lanes have something of a patchy track record and can pose authorities problems as well as solutions. Many authorities in the US and beyond have converted, or are converting, parts of the highway network into ‘Managed Lanes’ and charging motorists a fee to avoid the delays on the adjoining free use lanes. Some authorities have converted underused High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes into priced-managed high occupancy/toll lanes (HOT lanes) whereby the price charged can vary depending on a number of fa
  • Public transport key to climate change, says report
    September 19, 2014
    A new report, released in advance of United Nations Secretary-General’s Climate Summit on 23 September, claims that more than US$100 trillion in cumulative public and private spending could be saved and 1,700 megatons of annual carbon dioxide (CO2) - a 40 percent reduction of urban passenger transport emissions - could be eliminated by 2050 if the world expands public transportation, walking and cycling in cities. The report, A Global High Shift Scenario, from the Institute for Transportation Development
  • Do buses need subsidies in congestion charging areas
    June 20, 2016
    David Crawford takes a look at the debate surrounding bus subsidies. Subsidies for public transport are a well-known and frequently-used policy tool directed at reducing the high environmental and social costs of peak-period traffic congestion. But at the end of last year the Swedish Centre for Transport Studies published a working paper entitled ‘Should buses still be subsidised in Stockholm?’ This concluded that the subsidy levels currently being applied in Stockholm could be nearly halved by setting bus