Skip to main content

UK commuters spend up to six times as much of their salary on rail fares as other European passengers

Rail commuters returning to work this week will face fresh fare increases, while spending up to six times as much of their salary on rail fares as European passengers on publicly owned railways, new research by the Action for Rail campaign has revealed. UK workers on average salaries will spend 14 per cent of their income on a monthly season ticket from Luton to London (£387), or 11 per cent from Liverpool to Manchester (£292). By contrast, similar commutes would cost passengers only two per cent of t
January 3, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
Rail commuters returning to work this week will face fresh fare increases, while spending up to six times as much of their salary on rail fares as European passengers on publicly owned railways, new research by the Action for Rail campaign has revealed.

UK workers on average salaries will spend 14 per cent of their income on a monthly season ticket from Luton to London (£387), or 11 per cent from Liverpool to Manchester (£292).

By contrast, similar commutes would cost passengers only two per cent of their income in France (£61), three per cent in Germany (£85) and Italy (£61) and four per cent in Spain (£75).

The analysis also shows that rail fares have increased by 56 per cent since 2006, more than double the change in average earnings (24 per cent) and inflation (26 per cent).

Action for Rail, a campaign by rail unions and the TUC, point to the UK’s privatised rail service as a key driver of costs. All other countries examined have largely publicly-owned rail services and lower costs for commuters.

The findings come as rail campaigners and workers plan to hold protests at over 100 stations around the country against fare rises and in support of public ownership.

According to national trade union TUC general secretary Frances O’Grady, years of failed privatisation has resulted in high ticket prices, overcrowded trains, understaffed services and out-of-date infrastructure.

General secretary of train drivers’ union ASLEF Mick Whelan called it scandalous that the UK government allows privatised train companies to make even more money for providing an ever-poorer service. He said the UK has the most expensive railway in Europe and the train companies are about to make it even more costly for people to travel. General secretary of the Transport Salaried Staffs' Association, Manuel Cortes said money made from the railways should be ploughed back into cheaper fares and service upgrades for the benefit of passengers.

Related Content

  • April 8, 2020
    UITP: Continuity of passenger transit ‘crucial’
    UITP says that passenger transport must not be interrupted by the Covid-19 pandemic, to ensure that "the health crisis does not turn into a social one".
  • June 9, 2015
    Mobility itself is moving says cubic
    Cubic’s Chris Bax looks at the challenges and benefits of implementing transport as a service. Imagine paying for travel in exactly the same way you buy your phone service. For example, you would pay a set amount in exchange for a monthly travel package covering up to 100km of free taxi journeys in your home city (including a guaranteed 15 minute pickup) and public transport usage within a 1,500km radius of your home. Not only would this option be cheaper than owning and maintaining your own car, you would
  • April 30, 2015
    The UK’s busiest crossing adopts free flow charging
    Colin Sowman looks at the transition to free-flow charging on the Dartford Crossing, a notorious congestion blackspot on the UK motorway network. The Dartford Crossing, where London’s orbital M25 motorway crosses the lower reaches of the River Thames 32km (20 miles) to the east of Central London, has long been a major source of congestion. Now, to alleviate the congestion caused by some 50 million crossings per year, the Highways Agency has adopted a free-flow charging system - but the Crossing’s location a
  • May 31, 2013
    Driverless vehicles will cause changes in society
    Paul Godsmark gives his views on what the advent of autonomous vehicles would mean for the wider society. Further to your article ‘Driver not required…’ in the Jan/Feb edition of ITS International which gave some great background to autonomous road vehicle (ARVs), I feel that the bigger picture is needed to aid understanding. There is a ‘technology freight train’ heading our way that is going to transform our roadways but we don’t seem to be aware of it and, therefore, are in no hurry to react.