Toyota to turn Mobility Teammate concept into reality by 2020

Toyota has pledged to make its Mobility Teammate concept a reality by 2020. The Japanese manufacturer announced during the ITS World Congress in Bordeaux yesterday that it has been testing a new automated driving vehicle – called Highway Teammate - in Japan and planned to bring products based on it to market in the next five years. The new vehicle, a Lexus GS which has been modified for autonomous driving, has been tested on a section of highway in Tokyo, changing lanes and entering and exiting at junctions
October 6, 2015 Read time: 2 mins

1686 Toyota has pledged to make its Mobility Teammate concept a reality by 2020. The Japanese manufacturer announced during the ITS World Congress in Bordeaux yesterday that it has been testing a new automated driving vehicle – called Highway Teammate - in Japan and planned to bring products based on it to market in the next five years.

The new vehicle, a Lexus GS which has been modified for autonomous driving, has been tested on a section of highway in Tokyo, changing lanes and entering and exiting at junctions without help from the driver.

Mobility Teammate is based on the idea that interactions between drivers and cars should “share the same purpose, like close friends who sometimes watch over each other and sometimes help each other out”. Toyota has been active in this area since the 1990s, but the announcement this week suggests that the company will now be pumping resources into research and development, with Toyota saying it wants to achieve a society where “mobility means safety, efficiency and freedom”.

A spokeswoman added that Mobility Teammate could be important for older people especially – a theme that was touched on at the opening of the Congress this week by Violeta Bulc, EC commissioner for mobility and transport. Like Japan, Europe has an ageing population which would benefit from autonomous driving and connected vehicles, she said, since it would give older people who might not otherwise be able to use cars an opportunity for an extended social life.

Bulc also warned that the ingenuity of companies such as Toyota will not be sufficient by itself to ensure widespread uptake of driverless cars. “The intelligence of vehicles will not be enough – we need intelligent infrastructure,” she said.

Related Content

  • February 1, 2012
    Legalities of in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures
    Paul Laurenza of Dykema Gossett PLLC discusses the paths which lawmakers may go down on the route to making in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures a reality. The question of whether or not to mandate in-vehicle systems for safety and other applications is a vexed one. There is a presumption on some parts that going down the road of forcing systems' fitment is somehow too domineering or restricting. Others would argue that it is the only realistic way of ensuring that systems achieve widespread d
    Read More
  • August 21, 2018
    Big wheels keep on turnin’
    Many of the great and the good in the global mobility sector gathered at this year’s Movin’ On event in Montreal. Measured regulation of technologies and safety issues were major themes, reports David Arminas. *Bibendum is the original name for the Michelin Man, the symbol of the Michelin tyre company Autonomous vehicles, platooning, smart intersections and safety – these were the talking points over two-and-a-half days of the Movin’ On event in Montreal, Canada. Everyone in the mobility sector is at the
    Read More
  • June 9, 2015
    Mobility itself is moving says cubic
    Cubic’s Chris Bax looks at the challenges and benefits of implementing transport as a service. Imagine paying for travel in exactly the same way you buy your phone service. For example, you would pay a set amount in exchange for a monthly travel package covering up to 100km of free taxi journeys in your home city (including a guaranteed 15 minute pickup) and public transport usage within a 1,500km radius of your home. Not only would this option be cheaper than owning and maintaining your own car, you would
    Read More
  • February 1, 2012
    Enforcement needs automation and communication
    TISPOL's Peter van de Beek questions whether the thought processes which drive enforcement technology development are always the right ones. Peter van de Beek sees an ever-greater role for technology in traffic enforcement but is concerned that the emphasis of technological development and discussion is not always in the right places. 'Old-fashioned' face-to-face policing remains as valid as it ever did, he feels, but adds that there should be greater communication with those engaged at the sharp end of saf
    Read More

Highlighted Content