Skip to main content

Toll option for new Cape Fear bridge

North Carolina councillors voted to leave option open for proposed structure
By Liam McLoughlin June 6, 2025 Read time: 2 mins
Cape Fear Memorial Bridge in Wilmington, NC (© Rzyotova | Dreamstime.com)

Councillors in North Carolina have left the option open for the proposed replacement Cape Fear Memorial Bridge to be a toll bridge.

Planning and development are underway to replace the Cape Fear Memorial Bridge in Wilmington. The bridge spans the Cape Fear River between Brunswick and New Hanover counties.

Councillors at the Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (WMPO) voted to leave the toll option open for the proposed new bridge by eight votes to four, according to local news outlet WECT.

The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDoT) says that the bridge replacement would help improve traffic congestion and mobility on a corridor that connects local communities and carries trucks transporting freight to and from the Port of Wilmington.

The proposed new bridge would cost an estimated US$1bn-plus to build. ITS International's sister title Global Highways previously reported that funding worth US$242m was being provided to NCDoT for the Cape Fear bridge replacement project in a funding package being delivered through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, but this has come into doubt since the election of the Trump administration. 

The toll option would be one possible way of helping to fill any potential gap in funding.

NCDoT adds that the existing four-lane, steel vertical-lift bridge built in 1969 is becoming functionally obsolete and can no longer effectively service current traffic demands.

"While the existing bridge is safe, it is reaching the end of its lifecycle and must be monitored, inspected and maintained on a more frequent basis," NCDOT states.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • TRL: Cities must do more to help VRUs
    May 9, 2019
    UK cities must learn from the Netherlands and Denmark if active travel and increased safety for vulnerable road users are to co-exist, says TRL’s Marcus Jones Active travel’ refers to modes of transport in which physical effort is required to undertake purposeful journeys - for example, walking or cycling to school, work or the local shops, as well as walking and standing as part of accessing public transport. The benefits of replacing short car journeys with more active forms of transport are obvious. Act
  • New solutions to old problems set to cut emergency response times
    April 30, 2015
    David Crawford looks at the latest developments in emergency response. Ensuring speedier reactions to transport and travel crises is becoming increasingly important. US statistics suggest that as many as 1,000 ‘saveable’ lives can be lost each year in major cities because of operational defects in their SOS operations.
  • ITS instrumental in reducing Texan congestion
    September 4, 2018
    ITS projects in the Houston area have seen costs crunched – and even a system failure has proved valuable in analysing performance. David Crawford reports on developments in the Lone Star state Savings by Texan public agencies are major factors in the recent ITS Texas awards, recognising beneficial initiatives in bridge strike prevention and traffic intersection control. In the first, the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT)’s Houston District, covering the state’s most populous city and its surround
  • Europe’s EasyWay project accommodates political requirements
    May 29, 2013
    The EasyWay project has evolved to take account of political developments at the European level. By Jason Barnes The European Union’s (EU’s) EasyWay ITS deployment project has its roots in the ambitions of former European Commission President Jacques Delors with regard to truly international networks for energy, information and for transport. Definition of what became known as the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) began back in 1994 with seven working groups. They produced an R&D and policy framework