Skip to main content

Tiredness as dangerous as severe alcohol-impaired driving

According to research produced by Utrecht University in the Netherlands and published in the Journal of Sleep Research, just two hours of continuous nocturnal driving is sufficient to produce driving impairment comparable to a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.05%. After four hours, driving impairment corresponded to a BAC of 0.10% - well over the drink drive limit for most countries.
May 17, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
According to research produced by 5584 Utrecht University in the Netherlands and published in the Journal of Sleep Research, just two hours of continuous nocturnal driving is sufficient to produce driving impairment comparable to a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.05%. After four hours, driving impairment corresponded to a BAC of 0.10% - well over the drink drive limit for most countries.

To arrive at these conclusions, researchers at Utrecht tested 14 healthy young men who drove three sessions during night-time on the open road. The driving sessions were of two, four, and eight hours (03:00–05:00, 01:00–05:00 and 21:00–05:00 hours) duration. They had to drive at a constant speed (130 km/h; 80 mph) and maintain a steady position in the middle of the traffic lane.

Standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP, cm) - measuring the weaving of the car in the last driving hour of each session - was the primary parameter which enabled the researchers to compare the effects of prolonged nocturnal highway driving with driving impairment (SDLP increment) observed at different BACs.

As the research points out, in industrialised countries, one-fifth of all traffic accidents can be ascribed to sleepiness behind the wheel. Indeed, the number of reported sleep-related accidents is probably an underestimation since it is difficult to assess driver sleepiness objectively. In quantifying the major impact of duration of nocturnal driving, the researchers believe that the comparison with BAC levels provides policy makers with evidence-based driving duration limits and makes the impact of prolonged nocturnal driving readily understandable to drivers.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Flexible, demand-based parking charges ease parking problems
    April 10, 2012
    Innovative parking initiatives on the US Pacific Coast. David Crawford reviews. Californian cities are leading the way in trialling new solutions to their endemic parking problems. According to Donald Shoup, a professor of urban planning at the University of California in Los Angeles, drivers looking for available spots can cause up to 74% of traffic congestion in downtown areas. One solution is variable, demand-responsive pricing of parking.
  • User based insurance is helping good drivers and identifying the bad ones
    November 28, 2013
    Thomas Hallauer gives an overview of Usage Based Insurance (UBI), an industry that is putting telematic devices into more vehicles than fleet management ever did. The insurance market is going through a transformation phase never seen before. Insurers have not only started to track individual cars for Usage Based Insurance (UBI), they are also using the technology to enhance consumer services as more drivers join up to these schemes. Progressive Insurance in the US has 1.4 million customers signed up to
  • Foldable EV unveiled
    August 16, 2013
    A group of scientists from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) has developed what is claimed to be the country’s first foldable electric vehicle (EV), the school has announced. Developed by Seo In-soo and his research team, the Armadillo-T uses a 13.6 kWh battery and four independent in-wheel motors that enable it to reach 60 kilometres per hour and travel approximately 100 kilometres on a single charge. The small, battery-powered vehicle weighs less than 500 kilograms and measures 2.
  • Zendrive: lunchtime driving in San Francisco riskier than rush hour
    January 23, 2018
    Lunch-hour driving across the San Francisco Bay Area between 11.00am and 2.00pm is riskier than morning and evening rush hour commutes with more than 50% of routes presenting a greater risk to drivers during lunch hour. These latest findings come from Zendrive’s Bay Area Commute Safety Snapshot which also revealed that the San Mateo Bridge is overall more dangerous during morning commutes between 6.00am to 11.00am.