Skip to main content

Tiredness as dangerous as severe alcohol-impaired driving

According to research produced by Utrecht University in the Netherlands and published in the Journal of Sleep Research, just two hours of continuous nocturnal driving is sufficient to produce driving impairment comparable to a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.05%. After four hours, driving impairment corresponded to a BAC of 0.10% - well over the drink drive limit for most countries.
May 17, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
According to research produced by 5584 Utrecht University in the Netherlands and published in the Journal of Sleep Research, just two hours of continuous nocturnal driving is sufficient to produce driving impairment comparable to a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.05%. After four hours, driving impairment corresponded to a BAC of 0.10% - well over the drink drive limit for most countries.

To arrive at these conclusions, researchers at Utrecht tested 14 healthy young men who drove three sessions during night-time on the open road. The driving sessions were of two, four, and eight hours (03:00–05:00, 01:00–05:00 and 21:00–05:00 hours) duration. They had to drive at a constant speed (130 km/h; 80 mph) and maintain a steady position in the middle of the traffic lane.

Standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP, cm) - measuring the weaving of the car in the last driving hour of each session - was the primary parameter which enabled the researchers to compare the effects of prolonged nocturnal highway driving with driving impairment (SDLP increment) observed at different BACs.

As the research points out, in industrialised countries, one-fifth of all traffic accidents can be ascribed to sleepiness behind the wheel. Indeed, the number of reported sleep-related accidents is probably an underestimation since it is difficult to assess driver sleepiness objectively. In quantifying the major impact of duration of nocturnal driving, the researchers believe that the comparison with BAC levels provides policy makers with evidence-based driving duration limits and makes the impact of prolonged nocturnal driving readily understandable to drivers.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Daimler’s double take sees machine vision move in-vehicle
    December 13, 2013
    Jason Barnes looks at Daimler’s Intelligent Drive programme to consider how machine vision has advanced the state of the art of vision-based in-vehicle systems. Traditionally, radar was the in-vehicle Driver Assistance System (DAS) technology of choice, particularly for applications such as adaptive cruise control and pre-crash warning generation. Although vision-based technology has made greater inroads more recently, it is not a case of ‘one sensor wins’. Radar and vision are complementary and redundancy
  • Half of Brits want e-scooter restrictions
    June 3, 2021
    Survey respondents in UK say licences and age restrictions are vital for safety
  • Tatweer smart platform aims to reduce human driving error
    May 10, 2023
    System automates driving behaviour assessment to increase accuracy and cut costs
  • TRA 2018: Vienna conference highlights
    June 5, 2018
    Digitalisation of transport systems, the regulation of new technologies and more charging points for electric vehicles in cities were among the talking points at this year’s Transport Research Arena conference. Alan Dron sifts through the highlights in Vienna. More than 3,000 transport sector specialists converged on TRA 2018, where the four-day event’s agenda included scores of topics covering regulation, technology and the effect of the digitalisation of road transport systems. Who should control those