Skip to main content

TfL consults on proposals to withdraw cash fare payments

Transport for London (TfL) has launched a public consultation to seek customers’ views on proposals to withdraw cash fare payments on London buses. Since the introduction of the Oyster card in 2003, and the launch of contactless payment cards on London’s buses last year, fewer than one per cent of bus fares are now paid in cash, down from 25 per cent in 2000. TfL is now putting proposals to passengers that would see cash fare payments on London buses ending in 2014. Research shows that the majori
August 20, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
1466 Transport for London (TfL) has launched a public consultation to seek customers’ views on proposals to withdraw cash fare payments on London buses.

Since the introduction of the Oyster card in 2003, and the launch of contactless payment cards on London’s buses last year, fewer than one per cent of bus fares are now paid in cash, down from 25 per cent in 2000.  TfL is now putting proposals to passengers that would see cash fare payments on London buses ending in 2014.    

Research shows that the majority of cash paying passengers tend to be aged between 16 and 34, with 80 per cent of all passengers using cash doing so because they have insufficient funds on their Oyster card - using a contactless payment card would be a convenient option when this happens.

Leon Daniels, managing director for TfL Surface Transport, said: “The proposals we are consulting on reflect the changing way that our customers pay for their journeys – with the vast majority now benefiting from the best possible fares and the convenience that Oyster and contactless payment cards deliver.

“It costs US$38 million a year to accept cash on buses and with so few customers paying cash it makes sense for us to consider removing it. The savings made can then be invested into making further vital improvements to the capital’s transport network.”

Related Content

  • January 29, 2021
    Opinion: MaaSive fail
    Are we in danger of losing our way on Mobility as a Service? Johan Herrlin of Ito World wonders if there is too much focus on the system and not enough on problem-solving...
  • April 11, 2014
    Mayor’s lane rental scheme cuts roadwork disruption
    A new study into London’s lane rental scheme shows that since its introduction the amount of serious and severe disruption caused by planned roadworks has been cut by 46 per cent on the capital’s busiest roads, reducing delays for all road users. The scheme, which came into effect in June 2012 on the busiest parts of London’s road network, is designed to encourage utility companies to avoid digging up the busiest roads at peak traffic times. Following the introduction of the scheme, around 90 per cent of
  • June 20, 2016
    Do buses need subsidies in congestion charging areas
    David Crawford takes a look at the debate surrounding bus subsidies. Subsidies for public transport are a well-known and frequently-used policy tool directed at reducing the high environmental and social costs of peak-period traffic congestion. But at the end of last year the Swedish Centre for Transport Studies published a working paper entitled ‘Should buses still be subsidised in Stockholm?’ This concluded that the subsidy levels currently being applied in Stockholm could be nearly halved by setting bus
  • August 25, 2020
    TfL launches app to aid social distancing
    App provides accessibility information for disabled users, TfL says.