Skip to main content

Spanish rail accident ‘could be the result of over-speed’

Investigations continue into the cause of the train crash approaching the Spanish city of Santiago de Compostela, but suggestions that the train was travelling too fast appear to be gaining weight. Officials say one of the train's drivers has been put under formal investigation. The president of railway firm Renfe, Julio Gomez Pomar, has said the train in the crash had no technical problems. "The train had passed an inspection that same morning. Those trains are inspected every 7,500km... Its maintenance r
July 26, 2013 Read time: 3 mins
Investigations continue into the cause of the train crash approaching the Spanish city of Santiago de Compostela, but suggestions that the train was travelling too fast appear to be gaining weight.

Officials say one of the train's drivers has been put under formal investigation.

The president of railway firm Renfe, Julio Gomez Pomar, has said the train in the crash had no technical problems.  "The train had passed an inspection that same morning. Those trains are inspected every 7,500km... Its maintenance record was perfect," he told Spanish radio.

However, Sim Harris, managing editor of Rail News, and a leading rail expert, said modern railway networks were designed to prevent trains running out of control and was puzzled that the train was not slowed down by modern automatic protection systems.

One of the drivers, who was trapped in the cab of the train after the accident, is quoted as saying moments after the crash that the train had taken the curve at 190 km/h (118mph) when entering the curve, unidentified investigation sources have told Spanish media. The speed limit on that section of track is 80km/h.

Two UK experts have both said that travel is generally a safe mode of travel.  Peter Sheppard from 6674 The Institution of Engineering and Technology said: “However, and this is based on news reports only, it would seem that both are as a result of human error and not the technology involved.  Based on the first reports it seems to be as a result of a significant over-speed (although there could well be other factors as what is perceived by passengers is sometime different to reality).
 
“What has to happen when the enquiries are complete is to determine if there is any methods by which technology could have intervened, prevented or given early warning of these accidents and either supported the infrastructure maintenance teams or advised/intervened in the cab.”

Philippa Oldham, head of transport at the 5025 Institution of Mechanical Engineers, said in response to the accident: “It is still too early to say with any certainty exactly what happened to cause the tragic events in north west Spain on Wednesday, but accident investigators are likely to be looking at a number of factors which could have caused or contributed to this accident.

“They will be looking at the role of the signalling and speed advice system, as well as the role of the driver. Rail travel remains one of the safest ways to travel, with far fewer deaths and injuries than other forms of transport such as car travel.”

Related Content

  • Progress towards a pan-European cooperative infrastructure
    July 17, 2012
    Kallistratos Dionelis, General Secretary of ASECAP, makes the case for a lightly regulated, staged progression towards a pan-European cooperative infrastructure environment, the achievement of which should look to engender cooperation between the public and private sectors. Such an approach, he says, is the only real path to success.
  • Driverless vehicles will cause changes in society
    May 31, 2013
    Paul Godsmark gives his views on what the advent of autonomous vehicles would mean for the wider society. Further to your article ‘Driver not required…’ in the Jan/Feb edition of ITS International which gave some great background to autonomous road vehicle (ARVs), I feel that the bigger picture is needed to aid understanding. There is a ‘technology freight train’ heading our way that is going to transform our roadways but we don’t seem to be aware of it and, therefore, are in no hurry to react.
  • Majority of Brits do not think AVs will reduce accidents, says Axa
    December 3, 2018
    Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error. In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians. Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in mo
  • US Cities push for smarter poles
    June 25, 2018
    US Cities The need to connect existing infrastructure has led various US transit authorities into imaginative alleyways: David Crawford examines some new roles for street furniture. US cities are vying with each other in developing schemes to create a new generation of connected places. Their strategies include taking advantage of their streetlight poles’ height and ubiquity to give them new roles in supporting intelligent nodes. They are now being equipped for collecting real-time data on key transport