Skip to main content

Spanish rail accident ‘could be the result of over-speed’

Investigations continue into the cause of the train crash approaching the Spanish city of Santiago de Compostela, but suggestions that the train was travelling too fast appear to be gaining weight. Officials say one of the train's drivers has been put under formal investigation. The president of railway firm Renfe, Julio Gomez Pomar, has said the train in the crash had no technical problems. "The train had passed an inspection that same morning. Those trains are inspected every 7,500km... Its maintenance r
July 26, 2013 Read time: 3 mins
Investigations continue into the cause of the train crash approaching the Spanish city of Santiago de Compostela, but suggestions that the train was travelling too fast appear to be gaining weight.

Officials say one of the train's drivers has been put under formal investigation.

The president of railway firm Renfe, Julio Gomez Pomar, has said the train in the crash had no technical problems.  "The train had passed an inspection that same morning. Those trains are inspected every 7,500km... Its maintenance record was perfect," he told Spanish radio.

However, Sim Harris, managing editor of Rail News, and a leading rail expert, said modern railway networks were designed to prevent trains running out of control and was puzzled that the train was not slowed down by modern automatic protection systems.

One of the drivers, who was trapped in the cab of the train after the accident, is quoted as saying moments after the crash that the train had taken the curve at 190 km/h (118mph) when entering the curve, unidentified investigation sources have told Spanish media. The speed limit on that section of track is 80km/h.

Two UK experts have both said that travel is generally a safe mode of travel.  Peter Sheppard from 6674 The Institution of Engineering and Technology said: “However, and this is based on news reports only, it would seem that both are as a result of human error and not the technology involved.  Based on the first reports it seems to be as a result of a significant over-speed (although there could well be other factors as what is perceived by passengers is sometime different to reality).
 
“What has to happen when the enquiries are complete is to determine if there is any methods by which technology could have intervened, prevented or given early warning of these accidents and either supported the infrastructure maintenance teams or advised/intervened in the cab.”

Philippa Oldham, head of transport at the 5025 Institution of Mechanical Engineers, said in response to the accident: “It is still too early to say with any certainty exactly what happened to cause the tragic events in north west Spain on Wednesday, but accident investigators are likely to be looking at a number of factors which could have caused or contributed to this accident.

“They will be looking at the role of the signalling and speed advice system, as well as the role of the driver. Rail travel remains one of the safest ways to travel, with far fewer deaths and injuries than other forms of transport such as car travel.”

Related Content

  • June 16, 2020
    Speed limits: is 20 really plenty?
    Speed kills – which means cutting speed should cut collisions. But is it that simple?
  • January 30, 2012
    Road design as a primary aid to speed enforcement?
    Letty Aarts, senior researcher, SWOV institute for road safety research, the Netherlands, discusses how road design can act as a primary aid to speed enforcement
  • June 3, 2015
    Distraction dominated teen driver accident causes.
    As a new report shows that distracted driving is a bigger cause of accidents than previously thought, Jon Masters asks what should be done to counter this problem. Research carried out by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety has shed new light on the dangers of distraction for teen drivers. Six years of study using video analysis has shown that 58% of all crashes involving teen drivers are caused by the driver being distracted and proved that the influence of external factors is stronger than previously th
  • July 17, 2017
    Hyperloop One completes Hyperloop full systems test
    Hyperloop One has completed its first full systems Hyperloop test in a vacuum environment at the company’s test track in the Nevada desert. The vehicle coasted above the first portion of the track for 5.3 seconds using magnetic levitation and reached nearly 2Gs of acceleration, while achieving the Phase 1 target speed of 70mph. The company is now entering the next campaign of testing, which will target speeds of 250 mph. Hyperloop One tested all the system's components, including its highly efficient motor,