Skip to main content

Singapore transport minister: ‘Use ITS wisely’

ITS can bring great benefits – but the industry must be mindful of the potential downsides too. That was the candid message from Khaw Boon Wan, Singapore’s minister for transport, at the Opening Ceremony of ITS World Congress 2019. “The upsides of ITS are compelling,” he said. “But while technology can transform society, it can also be divisive.” For example, the growth of ride-hailing has brought advantages to many people, but has been disruptive for some; while new cybersecurity vulnerabilities can
October 24, 2019 Read time: 2 mins

Direct from ITS World Congress 2019

ITS can bring great benefits – but the industry must be mindful of the potential downsides too. That was the candid message from Khaw Boon Wan, Singapore’s minister for transport, at the Opening Ceremony of 6456 ITS World Congress 2019.

“The upsides of ITS are compelling,” he said. “But while technology can transform society, it can also be divisive.”

For example, the growth of ride-hailing has brought advantages to many people, but has been disruptive for some; while new cybersecurity vulnerabilities can compromise public safety.

Governments cannot allow a tech divide to flourish, he went on: “We must be mindful that most people are not engineers or techies.”

What matters to the vast majority of the population is that public transport is fast, safe, reliable “and very importantly, affordable”. It must also contribute to people’s quality of life.

 “Technology is but a means to achieve these political objectives – but it must be implemented wisely.”

Given that Singapore is “small and densely populated, we take transport planning very seriously”. This means exploring a wide range of platforms and taking “hard-headed decisions”. “We do not rush to be ahead of the curve, to be the first to deploy new-fangled technologies,” he added.

He concluded: “There is no one-size-fits-all for transport that transcends place and time.”

For example, what works for Copenhagen, venue of the previous World Congress, will not be what suits Singapore – and that what works today for Singapore itself “might not work in 10 years’ time”.

Related Content

  • October 22, 2012
    Doris Bures outlines Austrias influence on ITS
    Austria has built a strong ITS industry and become an important location in the sector. Doris Bures, Federal Minister for Transport, Innovation and Technology talks about what the country has to offer the global ITS community
  • March 28, 2018
    P3s offer new options for public transit agencies
    David Crawford welcomes new US guidance on public-private partnerships in the public transit sector. Public-private partnerships (P3s) are becoming increasingly favoured as a means of cost-effectively delivering much-needed public transit projects across the US. Previously, researched examples have tended to be on the large-scale while information on the potential for smaller, more localised schemes has been comparatively sparse. In a bid to fill that gap, the ‘Public Transportation Guidebook for Small
  • March 15, 2019
    Asfinag makes case for ITS-G5 over 5G
    Asfinag’s Manfred Harrer and Peter Meckel talk to Jason Barnes about the organisation’s first steps towards C-ITS deployments - and why ITS-G5 will be the underpinning standard For quite a number of years, it was assumed that the connectivity required for cooperative ITS (C-ITS) applications and autonomous vehicle (AV) operations would be catered for by a bespoke communications solution/protocol. This would provide localised ad hoc communication in a manner similar to Wi-Fi, and the dedicated bandwidth/n
  • July 8, 2019
    London needs just one road user charge, says report
    London’s patchwork of road charging schemes should be replaced by a single, distance-based user charge, according to new research. Apart from anything else, it would be much fairer… The UK capital’s multiple road charging schemes require a radical overhaul, according to a new report by the Centre for London thinktank. The suggested solution is to replace existing levies on drivers with a single, distance-based user charge which would more fairly reflect how much, and at what time, people are using London