Skip to main content

Safer vehicles for US roads

Tougher testing standards are being introduced in the US to measure vehicle crash performance. The new tests are focusing strongly on side impacts, with the introduction of a new pole impact category.
February 9, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
Tougher testing standards are being introduced in the US to measure vehicle crash performance. The new tests are focusing strongly on side impacts, with the introduction of a new pole impact category. This has been introduced as it is recognised that while side impacts into poles and trees only form a small percentage of vehicle crashes, they represent a major hazard to road users. Modern cars have been designed over the last 40 years to offer ever better impact performance, with 1685 Mercedes having led the field in the development of cars featuring crumple zones. However side impacts with poles have taken less of a precedent during design, something that the authorities now wish to address. For new vehicle buyers it will be worth noting that the new crash ratings will result in many recent models achieving lower scores than previously. However these lower scores will reflect the introduction of the new pole test and may actually be safer than those vehicles with higher scores awarded a few years before. The 834 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says it will conduct an extensive campaign to make the public aware that the new vehicles will face an additional test and that scores may be affected, although overall safety for the user will actually improve.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Robust enforcement strategy needed for free flow toll roads
    January 10, 2012
    Timidity has no place in effective enforcement operations on free-flow toll roads, says the NRA's Cathal Masteron. What's needed is a robust strategy which starts big and reduces in size over time, rather than starts small and gains a reputation for being easy to avoid
  • Intersection collision avoidance system trial
    January 31, 2012
    Although much of the emphasis of research into intersection management has tended to concentrate on the needs of urban locations, there remain specific issues pertaining to rural intersections which need to be addressed. Here, Rebecca Szymkowski and Greg Helgeson, Wisconsin DOT, Todd Szymkowski, University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Craig Shankwitz and Arvind Menon, University of Minnesota detail progress on an intersection collision avoidance system for more remote locations.
  • "AI can help fast-track Net Zero and Vision Zero," says VivaCity
    January 16, 2024
    Artificial intelligence isn't just about self-driving cars - and ‘smart’ doesn't always have to be shiny, new and innovative. Mark Nicholson, CEO at VivaCity, offers a few predictions for 2024...
  • C/AVs could mean cheaper roads
    October 28, 2019
    The safety benefits of C/AVs have long been promoted – but research suggests they should also contribute to cheaper roads. David Crawford investigates the potential benefits in infrastructure costs Building narrower freeway lanes to accommodate the enhanced route-tracking capabilities of connected and autonomous vehicles (C/AVs), running in platoon conditions, could result in cost savings of £0.5 million (€0.56 million or US$6.5 million) for every km of road length built. Such benefits could be secur