Skip to main content

Safer vehicles for US roads

Tougher testing standards are being introduced in the US to measure vehicle crash performance. The new tests are focusing strongly on side impacts, with the introduction of a new pole impact category.
February 9, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
Tougher testing standards are being introduced in the US to measure vehicle crash performance. The new tests are focusing strongly on side impacts, with the introduction of a new pole impact category. This has been introduced as it is recognised that while side impacts into poles and trees only form a small percentage of vehicle crashes, they represent a major hazard to road users. Modern cars have been designed over the last 40 years to offer ever better impact performance, with 1685 Mercedes having led the field in the development of cars featuring crumple zones. However side impacts with poles have taken less of a precedent during design, something that the authorities now wish to address. For new vehicle buyers it will be worth noting that the new crash ratings will result in many recent models achieving lower scores than previously. However these lower scores will reflect the introduction of the new pole test and may actually be safer than those vehicles with higher scores awarded a few years before. The 834 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says it will conduct an extensive campaign to make the public aware that the new vehicles will face an additional test and that scores may be affected, although overall safety for the user will actually improve.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Transport is evolving – and road safety must keep pace, says Parifex
    May 25, 2023
    France-headquartered Parifex works at the cutting edge of Lidar-based speed control systems. CEO Paul-Henri Renard discusses safety advances made in recent decades - and the causes of accidents that remain…
  • Front crash prevention slashes police-reported rear-end crashes, says IIHS
    January 29, 2016
    Vehicles equipped with front crash prevention are much less likely to rear-end other vehicles, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has found in the first study of the feature's effectiveness using US police-reported crash data. The study found that systems with automatic braking reduce rear-end crashes by about 40 per cent on average, while forward collision warning alone cuts them by 23 per cent. The automatic braking systems also greatly reduce injury crashes.
  • London’s strategy to tackle air quality problems
    October 21, 2014
    Colin Sowman talks to Matthew Pencharz, the man charged with charting London’s path between catering for traveller needs, conserving ancient buildings and conforming to modern air quality standards.
  • New technology revolution in urban traffic control?
    January 26, 2012
    Urban traffic control is a well-defined and practised art. Nevertheless, there are technologies here and on the horizon with the potential to revolutionise how we do things. By Gavin Jackman and Andrew Kirkham, TRL, and Jason Barnes. Distributed monitoring and control of urban traffic networks and flows is nothing new. PC-based Urban Traffic Control (UTC) is now well established and operating in many locations around the world. However, it is worth considering the effects of the huge growth in the use of sm