Skip to main content

Research reveals motoring costs cause many cars in the UK to go unused

Analysis from car sharing platform HyaCar indicates that nearly half of people in the UK cannot afford to own a car and those who do spend upwards of £2,500 each year on its general upkeep, excluding costs for petrol and overall depreciation.
June 19, 2017 Read time: 2 mins

Analysis from car sharing platform HyaCar indicates that nearly half of people in the UK cannot afford to own a car and those who do spend upwards of £2,500 each year on its general upkeep, excluding costs for petrol and overall depreciation. The analysis reveals the rising costs of motoring in the UK, as drivers spend money on vehicles that are often going unused.
 
Drivers in the south east are putting the most money into their motors - £220 per month, with the average yearly spend in London rising to £3133.20, or over £260 each month. The cost of owning a single car in the capital is now a greater monthly outgoing than a household's gas, electric, water, internet and phone bills combined. Out of cities across the UK, those in Norwich get off the lightest with a monthly outgoing of £165.80.
 
Ongoing upkeep costs - those unaffected by use - such as insurance, financing, tax, MOT and minor repair, were the biggest outgoing for nearly half (48.8%) of the respondents. While nearly half of the UK cannot afford a car, almost a third of those who do not own one believe a car would provide them with more freedom.
 
However, all drivers will be feeling the pinch when motoring costs are rising across the board - most recently with insurance premiums expected to break an average of £800 in June.

Despite the escalating costs and the effects of depreciation, many of Britain’s motorists actually drive their cars infrequently, says HyaCar. The new research from the peer to peer sharing firm revealed that nearly one million cars in the UK are being driven just once a month, with that figure rising to 2.4 million for cars driven once a week or less.

Related Content

  • September 28, 2020
    The benefit of Lidar: touch, don’t look
    The benefits of Lidar as a safety device for automobiles rather than as an enabler for AVs are easy to overlook – but Dr Jun Pei of Cepton Technologies tells Adam Hill why that would be a big mistake
  • June 30, 2020
    Lagos would welcome careful drivers
    An index has revealed the most dangerous parts of the world for car crashes, with cities in Africa, the US, India and Russia particularly challenging – although the rest of us might head to Calgary in Canada.
  • July 8, 2019
    London needs just one road user charge, says report
    London’s patchwork of road charging schemes should be replaced by a single, distance-based user charge, according to new research. Apart from anything else, it would be much fairer… The UK capital’s multiple road charging schemes require a radical overhaul, according to a new report by the Centre for London thinktank. The suggested solution is to replace existing levies on drivers with a single, distance-based user charge which would more fairly reflect how much, and at what time, people are using London
  • May 29, 2013
    ITS advancement lays beyond benefit-cost analysis
    Shelley Row, former Director of the US Department of Transportation’s ITS Joint Program Office, gives her views on the way forward for the industry. We, as intelligent transportation system (ITS) proponents and engineers, tend to be overly fixated on benefit-cost data. We want decisions to be made on logical grounds for which benefit-cost calculations are optimal. While benefit-cost data is necessary, it is not always sufficient. We can learn from our history where we see three broad groups of ITS deploymen