Skip to main content

RATP and POMA partner on cable transport

French public transport operator Régie Autonome des Transports Parisiens (RATP) and manufacturer of cable-driven lift systems Pomagalski (POMA) have signed a three year partnership agreement for cable transport in urban environments. The two organisations have agreed to share information on current and future cable transport projects worldwide. They will also study the opportunities for joint development of new projects and will respond jointly to bids of mutual interest in cable transport fields. “We
January 23, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
French public transport operator Régie Autonome des Transports Parisiens (4223 RATP) and manufacturer of cable-driven lift systems Pomagalski (POMA) have signed a three year partnership agreement for cable transport in urban environments.

The two organisations have agreed to share information on current and future cable transport projects worldwide. They will also study the opportunities for joint development of new projects and will respond jointly to bids of mutual interest in cable transport fields.
 
“We are convinced that cable transport is a mode for the future that will carve out its niche in the mobility chain and meet the demand of local authorities wishing to develop their urban transport network”, stated Pierre Mongin, RATP Group chief executive. “Our group has made inter-modality one of its leading strengths and wishes to master every mode of transport. Although we already have experience in cable transport thanks to the Montmartre funicular and the Salève cable system, we wish to strengthen our position further through this agreement.”
 
“This agreement will make it possible to combine the collective abilities, from one of the world leaders in urban transport and one of the world leaders in cable transport, to leverage our position as effectively as possible at a time when there are many urban projects in development both in France and internationally”, said Jean Souchal, president of the POMA management board. “Cable transport, including funiculars, cableways and overhead cable lines, addresses multiple implementation issues, as it has a very low impact on the environment and can adapt to the topography, making it easier to overcome obstacles and giving a useful component to a city’s transport network”.

Related Content

  • June 9, 2020
    Taking virtual control of the control room
    When you can’t meet customers face to face, it creates problems for all businesses. But Adam Hill finds that the control room tech sector has been adapting
  • April 10, 2012
    Why integrated traffic management needs a cohesive approach
    Traffic control is increasingly being viewed as one essential element of a wider ‘system of systems’ – the smart city. Jason Barnes, Jon Masters and David Crawford report on latest ideas and efforts for making cities ‘smarter’ Virtually every element of the fabric and utilitarian operations that make urban areas tick can now be found somewhere in the mix that is the ‘smart city’ agenda. Ideas have expanded and projects pursued in different directions as the rhetoric on making cities ‘smarter’ has grown. App
  • October 21, 2016
    Caltrans takes the long view of transport
    Caltrans’ Malcolm Dougherty took time out of his schedule at ITS America 2016 in San Jose to talk to ITS International about current and future challenges. As director of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) since mid-2012, many would say that Malcolm Dougherty has one of the best jobs in transportation. Caltrans is one of the most progressive and innovative transport authorities, implementing policies to encourage cycling, piloting new
  • July 23, 2012
    Towards common standards for cooperative road infrastructures
    Michael Noblett of Connexis discusses international progress towards common standards for cooperative road infrastructures. Will vehicle safety communications standards be able to support ITS on the international level, or will we settle once again for regional interoperability only? The answer lies in the current status of the draft standards themselves, and the requirements users and authorities are placing on the people who draft them.