Skip to main content

Rail signalling system ‘could be liable to hacking’

A new rail signalling system to be installed across the UK could be liable to hacking, a government adviser has warned. Professor David Stupples told the BBC that the European Rail Traffic Management system (ERTMS) could be exposed to malicious software, or malware, and used to cause an accident perhaps telling the system the train is slowing when down when it is speeding up. "However, he said governments aren't complacent."Certain ministers know this is absolutely possible and they are worried about
April 27, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
A new rail signalling system to be installed across the UK could be liable to hacking, a government adviser has warned.

Professor David Stupples told the BBC that the European Rail Traffic Management system (ERTMS) could be exposed to malicious software, or malware, and used to cause an accident perhaps telling the system the train is slowing when down when it is speeding up.

"However, he said governments aren't complacent."Certain ministers know this is absolutely possible and they are worried about it. Safeguards are going in, in secret, but it's always possible to get around them," he said.

ERTMS uses a computer in the driver's cab to control the speed and movement of the train, whilst taking account of other trains on the railway. Although still operating under the umbrella term of ERTMS, 5021 Network Rail says it is creating its own traffic management system to optimise performance.

Network Rail said it acknowledges the threat. A spokesman said "We know that the risk [of a cyber-attack] will increase as we continue to roll out digital technology across the network. We work closely with government, the security services, our partners and suppliers in the rail industry and external cyber security specialists to understand the threat to our systems and make sure we have the right controls in place."

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Taking the long view of ITS
    March 24, 2015
    Caroline Visser believes the ITS industry must present a coherent case for consideration of the technology to become part of transport policy and planning. As ITS advisor and road finance director for the International Road Federation (IRF) in Geneva, Caroline Visser is well placed to evaluate quantifying the benefits of ITS implementation – a topic about which there is little agreement and even less consistency. She is pressing to get some consistency in the evaluation of ITS deployments through the use of
  • Covid-19 risks creating US ‘transit death spiral’
    July 24, 2020
    Ridership is way down and the government is urged to find more money to help
  • Bright shiny green future: Asecap Sustainability Forum
    August 30, 2023
    Knowing your company’s carbon footprint is one thing, but the real issue is understanding and reporting to investors Scope 3 emissions. David Arminas reports from the 2nd Asecap Sustainability Forum in Vienna, Austria
  • Self-driving car safety perspectives
    June 2, 2015
    At yesterday’s Opening Plenary, Chris Urmson’s keynote speech dealt with the reality of driverless cars on our roads. By far and away their greatest benefit to mankind will be the potential to achieve an incredible saving of life and injury on the roads, as Urmson, director of the Google Self-Driving Car program, revealed to delegates. In response to an Associated Press article last month disclosing that self-driving cars have been involved in four accidents in the state of California, Urmson revealed th