Skip to main content

Rail safety technology launched in Central Minnesota

New safety technology being installed along some rail lines across the US, including Central Minnesota, aims to prevent deadly train crashes caused by human error. The technology is designed to automatically stop or slow a train to prevent accidents such as a collision with another train or a derailment caused by excessive speed. The changes stem from federal legislation passed in 2008 after a commuter train collided head-on with a freight train in California, killing twenty-five people and injuring 135. An
January 7, 2013 Read time: 3 mins
New safety technology being installed along some rail lines across the US, including Central Minnesota, aims to prevent deadly train crashes caused by human error. The technology is designed to automatically stop or slow a train to prevent accidents such as a collision with another train or a derailment caused by excessive speed.

The changes stem from federal legislation passed in 2008 after a commuter train collided head-on with a freight train in California, killing twenty-five people and injuring 135. An investigation found the train driver was sending and receiving text messages shortly before the crash.

As a result, congress passed the Rail Safety Improvement Act, requiring positive train control technology to be implemented on all class I passenger lines and freight trains carrying certain hazardous materials by 2015.

Work has already begun to upgrade signals along Burlington Northern Santa Fe’s (BNSF) lines in Minnesota and will continue this year, according to Amy McBeth, a spokeswoman for the railway. BNSF has spent about US$300 million on positive train control upgrades on its entire rail system this year, she said.  “We are on track to meet that required deadline,” McBeth said, continuing “The travelling public probably won’t notice any difference after the technology is installed”.

2008 Amtrak also will install positive train control aboard its trains that run along BNSF rail lines, says Amtrak spokesman Marc Magliari.

6907 Metro Transit, which operates the Northstar commuter rail line between Big Lake and Minneapolis, expects to have its six locomotives and six cab cars outfitted with the equipment in 2014 after the wayside equipment is tested, spokesman John Siqveland said.

Positive train control uses GPS technology to determine a train’s location and speed. It warns train operators of potential problems, then overrides the driver and stops the train if the operator does not respond within a certain amount of time.

The system requires equipment installed along rail lines as well as aboard locomotives. It’s a complex endeavor expected to cost railroads more than US$13 billion to install and maintain over the next twenty years, according to the Association of American Railroads (AAR), which represents major US freight railroads and Amtrak.

According to the AAR, it is not clear whether railroads will meet the 2015 deadline. A report to Congress from the Federal Railroad Administration last August stated that due to significant technical and programmatic issues most railroads are not likely be able to fully implement positive train control by December 2015.

Holly Arthur, a spokeswoman for the AAR, said that, despite best efforts and financial investments, it is becoming clear that meeting the deadline is no longer realistic.  She said that each railroad’s positive train control system is very complex and must operate with other railroads’ systems. “The technology has never been used this way”, she said, “and must be designed, installed and tested before receiving federal certification.  This has never been done before.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Hackers remotely control jeep
    July 22, 2015
    Two US security experts have demonstrated security flaws in a Jeep Cherokee by taking wireless control of its systems from ten miles away. Writing on technology website Wired, Andy Greenberg, who was driving the jeep at the time, tells how Charlie Miller and Chris Valasek first toyed with the vehicle’s air conditioning, entertainment system and windscreen wipers, before cutting the transmission and causing the jeep to slowly come to a halt. Greenberg says, “The most disturbing manoeuvre came when they
  • ITS World Congress debates perceptions of enforcement
    December 4, 2012
    The technical programme of this year’s ITS World Congress in Vienna includes a special session on the image of enforcement. ITS International examines the scale of the problem and what can be done about it. Debate on the merits and difficulties of enforcing speed limits appears centred on a conflict of principles. Put very simply, local communities, people living close to busy or hazardous roads, want to see traffic speeds calmed. Drivers on those roads, on the whole, want their principle of freedom to be m
  • Indra to implement high speed rail traffic management system
    September 8, 2014
    State Turkish Rail (TCDD) has awarded Indra a US$55 million contract to implement a planning system for its entire rail network, together with a high-speed train management system. Indra will set up a new control centre in Ankara, equipped with cutting-edge technology, which will carry out operational planning for the country's 12,000 kilometre rail network, both conventional lines and high-speed tracks. In addition, Indra’s DaVinci rail traffic management system will support comprehensive high-speed
  • Wrong Way Detection System prevents accidents, improves safety
    January 31, 2012
    In 2006, within a span of four months, two incidents of drivers entering the 16km-long Westpark Tollway in Houston, Texas resulted in horrific accidents that caused a number of fatalities. As a result, Harris County Toll Road Authority (HCTRA) began investigating technologies that could help detect vehicles entering the tollway in the wrong direction.