Skip to main content

Rail safety technology launched in Central Minnesota

New safety technology being installed along some rail lines across the US, including Central Minnesota, aims to prevent deadly train crashes caused by human error. The technology is designed to automatically stop or slow a train to prevent accidents such as a collision with another train or a derailment caused by excessive speed. The changes stem from federal legislation passed in 2008 after a commuter train collided head-on with a freight train in California, killing twenty-five people and injuring 135. An
January 7, 2013 Read time: 3 mins
New safety technology being installed along some rail lines across the US, including Central Minnesota, aims to prevent deadly train crashes caused by human error. The technology is designed to automatically stop or slow a train to prevent accidents such as a collision with another train or a derailment caused by excessive speed.

The changes stem from federal legislation passed in 2008 after a commuter train collided head-on with a freight train in California, killing twenty-five people and injuring 135. An investigation found the train driver was sending and receiving text messages shortly before the crash.

As a result, congress passed the Rail Safety Improvement Act, requiring positive train control technology to be implemented on all class I passenger lines and freight trains carrying certain hazardous materials by 2015.

Work has already begun to upgrade signals along Burlington Northern Santa Fe’s (BNSF) lines in Minnesota and will continue this year, according to Amy McBeth, a spokeswoman for the railway. BNSF has spent about US$300 million on positive train control upgrades on its entire rail system this year, she said.  “We are on track to meet that required deadline,” McBeth said, continuing “The travelling public probably won’t notice any difference after the technology is installed”.

2008 Amtrak also will install positive train control aboard its trains that run along BNSF rail lines, says Amtrak spokesman Marc Magliari.

6907 Metro Transit, which operates the Northstar commuter rail line between Big Lake and Minneapolis, expects to have its six locomotives and six cab cars outfitted with the equipment in 2014 after the wayside equipment is tested, spokesman John Siqveland said.

Positive train control uses GPS technology to determine a train’s location and speed. It warns train operators of potential problems, then overrides the driver and stops the train if the operator does not respond within a certain amount of time.

The system requires equipment installed along rail lines as well as aboard locomotives. It’s a complex endeavor expected to cost railroads more than US$13 billion to install and maintain over the next twenty years, according to the Association of American Railroads (AAR), which represents major US freight railroads and Amtrak.

According to the AAR, it is not clear whether railroads will meet the 2015 deadline. A report to Congress from the Federal Railroad Administration last August stated that due to significant technical and programmatic issues most railroads are not likely be able to fully implement positive train control by December 2015.

Holly Arthur, a spokeswoman for the AAR, said that, despite best efforts and financial investments, it is becoming clear that meeting the deadline is no longer realistic.  She said that each railroad’s positive train control system is very complex and must operate with other railroads’ systems. “The technology has never been used this way”, she said, “and must be designed, installed and tested before receiving federal certification.  This has never been done before.”

Related Content

  • October 26, 2016
    Building the case for photo enforcement
    As red light enforcement is returning to some intersections and being shut down at others, new evidence has been released backing the safety campaigners, reports Jon Masters. In 2014, 709 Americans were killed in red-light-running crashes and an estimated 126,000 were injured according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).
  • February 1, 2012
    Legalities of in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures
    Paul Laurenza of Dykema Gossett PLLC discusses the paths which lawmakers may go down on the route to making in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures a reality. The question of whether or not to mandate in-vehicle systems for safety and other applications is a vexed one. There is a presumption on some parts that going down the road of forcing systems' fitment is somehow too domineering or restricting. Others would argue that it is the only realistic way of ensuring that systems achieve widespread d
  • April 29, 2021
    MetroLink to address rail road suicides 
    California rail agency will collaborate with University of Denver psychologists
  • July 26, 2013
    Spanish rail accident ‘could be the result of over-speed’
    Investigations continue into the cause of the train crash approaching the Spanish city of Santiago de Compostela, but suggestions that the train was travelling too fast appear to be gaining weight. Officials say one of the train's drivers has been put under formal investigation. The president of railway firm Renfe, Julio Gomez Pomar, has said the train in the crash had no technical problems. "The train had passed an inspection that same morning. Those trains are inspected every 7,500km... Its maintenance r