Skip to main content

Providing good public transport services ‘a challenge for rural areas’, says report

A new report from the International Transport forum at the OECD, International Experiences on Public Transport Provision in Rural Areas, claims that, to ensure continued access to public transport for citizens in rural areas, the definition of public transport should be reconsidered by public authorities. Low population density and competition from private cars make it difficult to operate profitable commercial public transport services in rural areas, as costs per passenger are much higher than in dense
May 12, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
A new report from the International Transport forum at the 7353 OECD, International Experiences on Public Transport Provision in Rural Areas, claims that, to ensure continued access to public transport for citizens in rural areas, the definition of public transport should be reconsidered by public authorities.

Low population density and competition from private cars make it difficult to operate profitable commercial public transport services in rural areas, as costs per passenger are much higher than in densely populated cities. Maintaining service levels through public subsidies is becoming more difficult in view of rising operating costs and constrained public funding ‑ leading to a vicious circle of reduced service or higher fares to contain rising costs.

Recent trends in mobility offer opportunities to alleviate the situation: New ways of providing information through mobile technology, new actors and services in the public transport market and changing user expectations and choices regarding their mobility are reshaping transport provision and demand. Yet, to profit from new mobility services that work also for rural areas, these developments should be reflected in changes in the legislative framework around public transport.

The report was commissioned from ITF by the Finnish Ministry of Transport and Communications and looks at international experiences on containing the rise in costs associated with public transport services in rural areas, showcases efficient solutions and illustrates new ways of organising public transport services based on case studies from the UK, France, Norway and Japan.

According to the report, international experiences show:  New ways of information provision are changing the public transport market; a major change in the perception of the concept of public transport, away from an exclusive focus on scheduled services and evolving to a more general provision of transport services accessible to any citizen; relaxing quantitative taxi regulation can enable new innovative solutions.

In addition, demand-responsive transport is seen as one of the key options to meet future public transport challenges. The report also claims that new forms of public transport do not diminish the importance of traditional public transport.

It also says there is significant potential for savings through coordination, such as pooling of passengers and combining non-passenger transport services with passenger transport.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Learning from informal transit networks
    March 30, 2021
    When it comes to public transportation, the Minority World could take lessons in equity from the mobility infrastructure of emerging market cities, says Devin de Vries of WhereIsMyTransport
  • Transit takes on demanding role
    April 2, 2021
    Community transport - or paratransit - has historically formed the basis of demand-responsive operations. But with new routing technologies, David Crawford sees wider potential
  • Mobility pricing offers new tools for managing mobility
    November 23, 2017
    Mobility pricing is the best way of sustaining and enhancing mobility, argues Moving Forward Consulting’s Josef Czako. Mobility pricing (MP) is effectively the culmination of the ‘user pays’ principle and has been referred to in many policy discussions about electronic toll collection, road user charging (RUC), and pricing. MP not only reflects the ‘use more, pay more’ nature of RUC, it also takes account of the external cost of journeys including pollution, noise, the cost of congestion and accidents.
  • Cost benefit goes under the microscope
    August 21, 2017
    Conventional cost benefit analysis (CBA) of plans for urban smart mobility initiatives needs serious rethinking, according to a recently-completed European study. The three-year Evidence Project (the Project) emerged in response to concerns about the availability and quality of documented research – including CBA – required to prove that investment in sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs) can be economically beneficial. Covering 22 sectors ranging from electric vehicles to shared spaces, the Project clai