Skip to main content

Pennsylvania transportation cut ‘would jeopardise local jobs’

Cutting highway and bridge work by 25 per cent in any given year, and then sustaining it in the years ahead, would cost Pennsylvania US$1.25 billion in lost economic activity over a five-year period and put as many as 9,600 jobs permanently at risk, the American Road & Transportation Builders Association’s (ARTBA) chief economist told state lawmakers at a recent hearing. Dr Alison Premo Black was invited to testify before the Pennsylvania Senate Transportation committee based on a report she authored on beh
August 2, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
Cutting highway and bridge work by 25 per cent in any given year, and then sustaining it in the years ahead, would cost Pennsylvania US$1.25 billion in lost economic activity over a five-year period and put as many as 9,600 jobs permanently at risk, the American Road & Transportation Builders Association’s (ARTBA) chief economist told state lawmakers at a recent hearing.

Dr Alison Premo Black was invited to testify before the Pennsylvania Senate Transportation committee based on a report she authored on behalf the Associated Pennsylvania Constructors.  It looked at the potential impact of a decrease in the state’s highway and bridge investment from the current US$4.3 billion market to US$3.8 billion in 2017.

“In this scenario, Pennsylvania contractors will demand fewer materials, equipment and supplies as the overall market opportunities decline and they have fewer projects backlogged,” Black explained.

“This would come at a time when investing in Pennsylvania’s infrastructure and economy is extremely important,” she said, noting that of the Commonwealth’s 28,000 miles of roadway eligible for federal aid, 25 per cent are rated not acceptable and need major repairs or replacement.  Over 40 per cent of the bridges in Pennsylvania are rated structurally deficient or functionally obsolete—well above the national average of 23 percent.
 
Black noted her analysis did not take into account the important long-term benefits of infrastructure investment, or the foregone opportunities the Pennsylvania economy would lose.  In economics literature, there is a link between state and local economic growth, and highway and bridge investment.

“A cut in Penn DOT funding could mean that the Commonwealth’s highway and bridge network would be less efficient in the future.  This would increase transportation costs, both time and money, for everyone that uses the system,” Black said.  “Businesses looking to relocate to Pennsylvania may look at the decline in investment as a disincentive and consider moving elsewhere.”

Related Content

  • Authorities look to MaaS for new solutions and cost savings
    July 18, 2017
    The structure of society and the way in which our cities work will be completely transformed by Mobility as a Service (MaaS), Finland’s minister of transport and communications Anne Berner, told ITS International’s recent MaaS Market conference 2017 in London. In her keynote address, Berner told a packed audience of more than 200 ITS professionals that MaaS has the potential to help governments around the world meet their big city targets such as the rate of employment, the environment, the efficient use of
  • IBTTA government affairs director Neil Gray dies 
    August 25, 2020
    Gray led efforts to achieve nation interoperability of electronic toll collection.
  • Dual purpose for new weigh-in-motion site
    October 13, 2014
    A new weigh-in-motion weighbridge is being installed on State Highway 1 at the Rakaia Bridge to support the introduction of high productivity motor vehicles (HPMV) on this key South Island, New Zealand, freight route. The HPMV system allows vehicles carrying a divisible load of essential goods to weigh more than the official 44 metric tonnes without a permit, but only on specified routes.
  • Value of time – the key decider
    March 4, 2014
    The ‘value of time’ concept can be a vital decider in prioritising transport projects, as Lorenzo Casullo and Serbjeet Kohli of Steer Davies Gleave explain. How much do travellers value their time and how much would they be willing to pay for a better and faster transport option? For many years Steer Davies Gleave (SDG) has been collecting this type of information from thousands of people across the world as it researches travellers’ behaviour. And given the importance of this parameter for transport mo