Skip to main content

Obama to propose oil tax to fund transportation projects

President Obama is to propose a US$10 a barrel tax on crude oil to fund the overhaul of the US transportation infrastructure. White House officials say the president’s 21st Century Clean Transportation System, funded by a new fee paid by oil companies would increase American investments in clean transportation infrastructure by roughly 50 per cent while reforming the investments already made to help reduce carbon pollution, cut oil consumption and create new jobs. They say the new fee on oil will also en
February 8, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
President Obama is to propose a US$10 a barrel tax on crude oil to fund the overhaul of the US transportation infrastructure.

White House officials say the president’s 21st Century Clean Transportation System, funded by a new fee paid by oil companies would increase American investments in clean transportation infrastructure by roughly 50 per cent while reforming the investments already made to help reduce carbon pollution, cut oil consumption and create new jobs. They say the new fee on oil will also encourage American innovation and leadership in clean technologies to help reshape our transportation landscape for the decades ahead.

Set to be announced in Obama’s Fiscal 2017 budget this week, the plan would provide nearly US$20 billion a year to help expand transit systems across the country and more than US$2 billion a year to support the research and development of self-driving vehicles and other low-carbon technologies.

“By placing a fee on oil, the President’s plan creates a clear incentive for private sector innovation to reduce our reliance on oil and at the same time invests in clean energy technologies that will power our future,” the White House said in a statement.

A leading Republican, Kevin McCarthy, whose area produces oil, said the plan would go nowhere in Congress, adding that it “would undoubtedly be passed along to consumers and would hit the American people with added costs during a period of prolonged economic insecurity in a weak economy.”

Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx called the proposal a "bold new plan that will create a clean transportation system and increase overall investment in ways that give American communities more climate friendly choices."

Related Content

  • December 2, 2015
    IBTTA, ITS America applaud long term FAST Act
    The International Bridge, Toll and Turnpike Association (IBTTA) and ITS America have applauded Congressional committee members on reaching agreement on a long-term surface transportation bill.
  • May 23, 2016
    Public transit CEOs highlight urgent need to invest in aging US public transportation systems
    CEOs of large, mid-size and small public US transportation systems attending a press call as part of National Infrastructure Week have sounded the alarm for the urgent need to increase infrastructure investment in America's public transportation systems. The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) cited a US$86 billion backlog in deferred maintenance and replacement needs with more than 40 per cent of buses and 25 per cent of rail transit assets in marginal or poor condition, according to the latest data
  • July 12, 2013
    NYSERDA, NYSDOT to fund fossil fuel-reducing transport projects
    The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) and the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) have partnered to provide funding to eleven businesses, non-profit organisations and research institutions to promote energy-saving technologies designed to reduce carbon-dioxide emissions in New York State.
  • January 23, 2015
    Private investment in Latin American infrastructure on the rise
    Private investment in infrastructure projects has grown significantly over the past decade in Latin America's six largest economies, with the exception of Mexico and Argentina, according to a Standard & Poor's report. In Mexico the retraction in private investment is explained by poor planning and execution of projects on the part of the government. Meanwhile in Argentina, the dip is explained by government intervention, according to the report. Outside the two regional powerhouses, private sector par