Skip to main content

Noise camera knowledge is far from sound, finds ITS UK

UK public doesn't like noisy vehicles - but also doesn't know about remedies
By David Arminas January 27, 2025 Read time: 3 mins
Excessively noisy cars and motorcycles are ones that have been modified or driven in a way that creates additional noise (© Sergey Rasulov | Dreamstime.com)

Recent polling in the UK shows that 69% of respondents support measures to tackle noisy vehicles. But it also shows awareness of noise cameras that detect excessively noisy vehicles is low.

Noise cameras such as the SoundVue 3BA can aid enforcement

Independent polling commissioned by ITS UK has shown most people support measures to make it easier to enforce noise limits on road vehicles. This comes alongside a new report from ITS UK that sets out key recommendations for the UK government to support the use of noise camera technology.

The findings of the independent survey of 2,050 individuals across the UK show that there is strong support for measures to make it easier to enforce against excessively noisy vehicles, with 69% in support and 16% opposing. Excessively noisy cars and motorcycles are ones that have been modified or driven in a way that creates additional noise.

The polling also shows that awareness of noise camera technology is low: two-thirds of the public (67%) have never heard of noise cameras. Meanwhile, 17% have heard of them but don't know any details. Ten per cent of respondents said they know at least a bit about noise cameras. Among those with access to a vehicle, awareness remains low at 28%.

According to the poll results, when noise cameras were explained to the respondents, support for their further roll-out is high, with 62% in support and 20% opposing it.

Half of respondents think public awareness of laws around excessively noisy vehicles and their enforcement is too low (50%) with only a fifth thinking it’s “about right” (20%).

Alongside the findings, ITS UK has published a new report urging the UK government to take further action to support noise camera technology. 

What are ITS UK's three recommendations on noise cameras?

  • It wants the establishment of a government-led noise group comprised of key industry stakeholders
  • There should also be publication of overdue guidance for local authorities
  • The government should support a public awareness campaign that promotes the positive role noise cameras can play in reducing noise pollution

“Noise cameras allow local authorities or the police to pinpoint and thereby enforce against, excessively noisy vehicles,” said Max Sugarman, chief executive of ITS UK. “Today’s polling shows that the public want to see action against noisy vehicles and that when explained, noise cameras have a high level of support amongst the public. The public polling also shows a clear desire for greater information and understanding about what noise cameras can do. 

“However, since trials concluded last year, there has been little support from government for the roll-out of this technology, with guidance for local authorities now overdue. The UK has great expertise in noise camera technology, and so support for this growing sector will not only mean quieter streets for communities around the UK, it will also mean backing a key market that has the potential to be exported around the world.”

“Most people aren't aware of noise camera technology but many are affected by excessively noisy vehicles particularly in big cities like London,” said Adam Drummond, head of political and social research at Opinium Research, which carried out the poll.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Keeping cities moving: five ways to manage traffic better with smart video
    May 3, 2022
    Excessive traffic is a growing issue on road networks around the world, and reliance on private vehicles is still increasing. The good news for authorities is that the latest smart video technologies can help to keep traffic flowing – cutting journey times, increasing road safety, and helping to reduce vehicle emissions, says Juan Sádaba, ITS Business Development Manager at Hikvision Spain
  • MaaS by any other name
    February 6, 2020
    Has the roll-out of Mobility as a Service stalled - or could it just be that multimodal travel is simply happening under a variety of different names?
  • Weighing up the future with AI
    April 14, 2022
    There is broad agreement that artificial intelligence will be an important part of Weigh in Motion as we go forward – but Adam Hill finds that not everyone agrees quite how close we are to that point
  • Dutch survey shows drivers are in favour of road user charging
    January 16, 2012
    'Keep it simple, stupid' is an oft-forgotten axiom but in terms of road user charging it is entirely appropriate. So says the ANWB's Ferry Smith. A couple of decades ago, it might have been largely true that the technology aspects of advanced road infrastructure were the main obstacles to deployment. However, 20 years or more of development have led to a situation where such 'obstacles' are often no more than a political fig-leaf. Area-wide Road User Charging (RUC) is a case in point; speak candidly to syst