Skip to main content

NHTSA urged to strike a balance on hybrid and EV sound requirements

In its comments to the National Highway Traffic Safety administration's (NHTSA) proposed rule to add sound to hybrid and electric vehicles, Global Automakers is asking the agency to find a noise level that effectively alerts pedestrians without being excessively loud. "Striking a balance is important," said Michael Cammisa, director of safety for Global Automakers, which represents international motor vehicle manufacturers, original equipment suppliers, and other automotive-related trade associations. "W
March 18, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
In its  comments  to the 834 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) proposed rule to add sound to hybrid and electric vehicles, Global Automakers is asking the agency to find a noise level that effectively alerts pedestrians without being excessively loud.   

"Striking a balance is important," said Michael Cammisa, director of safety for Global Automakers, which represents international motor vehicle manufacturers, original equipment suppliers, and other automotive-related trade associations. "While we support the intent of the regulation to assist pedestrians, we have concerns that the current proposal may lead to alert sounds that are excessively and unnecessarily noisy to others inside and outside of the vehicle."

In 2010, Global Automakers worked with lawmakers, the National Federation of the Blind, the American Council of the Blind, and other auto industry groups on the Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Act which directed NHTSA to undertake this rule-making, which is intended to assist pedestrians in identifying the presence of hybrid and electric vehicles by requiring automakers to add sound to these quiet cars.

"As hybrid and electric cars have become more widespread, some of our members have already added noise alerts to these vehicles," said Cammisa.  "We look forward to continuing to work with NHTSA and other stakeholders to improve these requirements before they are finalised."

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • NSC to prioritise VRU safety
    July 4, 2022
    Emphasis on pedestrians as US safety group admits: 'What we're doing isn't working'
  • What actually happens if we do #FreetheMIBs?
    May 1, 2020
    Q-Free’s #FREEtheMIBs campaign highlights the use of manufacturer-specific data output, storage and communication protocols in traffic lights and ITS systems.
  • US Wi-Fi Innovation Act could hamper V2V
    March 27, 2015
    The US government is looking into opening up wi-fi space for the public, but it could impact on vehicle-to-vehicle communication (V2V) technology developed to prevent up to 80 per cent of car crashes, according to a discussion on CBS News. After more than a decade in development and more than a half-billion dollars in taxpayer money spent, the technology aimed at making roads safer and saving an estimated 1,083 lives every year may now be sidelined to make room for wi-fi. Dr Peter Sweatman, director
  • V2V technologies expected to offer safety benefits, but challenges exist
    November 4, 2013
    A new report by the US Government Accountability office (GAO) expects vehicle to vehicle (V2V) technologies to offer safety benefits, but says that a variety of deployment challenges exist. The report finds that development of V2V technologies has progressed to the point of real world testing, and if broadly deployed, they are anticipated to offer significant safety benefits.