Skip to main content

New Zealand looks to World Congress for partners and solutions

New Zealand’s Minister of Transport, Energy and Safety, Simon Bridges has brought a clear message to ITS World Congress: “We are open for business”. He said the country’s regulatory regime is “as enabling as any in the world” for testing technology including driverless cars and unmanned aerial vehicles (drones).
October 12, 2016 Read time: 2 mins
New Zealand’s Minister of Transport, Energy and Safety, Simon Bridges

New Zealand’s Minister of Transport, Energy and Safety, Simon Bridges has brought a clear message to ITS World Congress: “We are open for business”. He said the country’s regulatory regime is “as enabling as any in the world” for testing technology including driverless cars and unmanned aerial vehicles (drones).

“We are not far off completing the road network and from that point on it has to be a case of getting smarter, and if we can go from 1.2 people per car to 1.7, that will make a massive difference,” said Bridges. With NZ’s vast rural areas, Bridges said the car is likely to remain the predominant form of mobility, but over time that will become driverless and car sharing will become normal.

However, the country’s cities are experiencing major growth and the government is planning a road charging system for Auckland; probably GPS based with variable rates per kilometre – although public acceptance remains an as-yet unknown factor. Reflecting technological advances, the NZ government is currently reviewing regulations concerning public transport, taxi, mini cab and taxi hailing app services to create a level playing field and remove the need for local knowledge – which satellite navigation has made largely irrelevant, Bridges said.

Bridges said this week’s ITC World Congress was a major opportunity for his country’s authorities to learn and discover solutions – as shown by the fact that the country has the second largest number of
delegates.

Related Content

  • December 23, 2015
    ITS sector must use less confusing industry terms says Q-Free
    For ITS to gain the recognition it deserves, Q-Free’s Knut Evensen argues that the sector must have a coherent message and avoid confusing the wider community with a bewildering array of terms and acronyms. Any industry or group of people will develop its own lexicon over time. The process is near-inevitable, as individuals’ knowledge bases increase and evolve, and terms for common wisdom are created and become truncated, or even slang. A danger, though, as a relatively small group looks to admit large numb
  • January 10, 2013
    Need for simpler urban tolling solutions
    A common assumption, even amongst informed observers, is that there’s but a handful of urban charging schemes in operation around the world and scant prospect of that changing any time soon. Larger city-sized schemes such as Singapore, London and Stockholm come readily to mind but if we take a wider view and also consider urban access control and Low Emission Zones (LEZs) then the picture changes rather radically. There is a notable concentration of such schemes in Europe but worldwide the number is comfort
  • May 30, 2014
    The Asia-Pacific poses a multitude of ITS challenges
    The Asia-Pacific ITS Forum and Exhibition in Auckland, New Zealand, provided a focus for the region’s ITS Associations. Mary Bell reports. In late April, ITS New Zealand hosted the 13th Asia-Pacific ITS Forum and Exhibition in Auckland. Around 350 delegates from 24 nations gathered to share and advance ITS applications on both strategic and technical levels and to discuss the differing and various challenges faced in the region.
  • January 31, 2012
    Managing congestion, better information changes perceptions
    Kapsch's Dietrich Leihs talks about the true fundamentals of urban pricing. In some Italian and German towns and cities, the solution to congestion is an outright ban on certain types of vehicles. As far as Dietrich Leihs is concerned, any attempt to sweeten the pill that is congestion charging is only ever going to be a partial success at best.