Skip to main content

New York to start congestion charging 'from January 2025'

Final approval for delayed scheme still required as $15 toll lowered to $9
By Adam Hill November 15, 2024 Read time: 2 mins
Big Apple: finally taking a bite out of congestion? (© Brett Critchley | Dreamstime.com)

New York City's congestion charging scheme - which was put on hold earlier this year by New York state governor Kathy Hochul - is now back on the agenda.

As New York City Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) puts it: "The Central Business District Tolling Program has been unpaused."

The MTA board and Federal Highway Administration still need to officially approve the scheme - whose purpose is to reduce congestion, improve air quality and provide funds for public transportation. 

From 5 January 2025, the proposed daily charge will be $9 to enter the congestion charge zone which covers parts of Manhattan - down from the $15 which was originally proposed.

Hochul says that the 40% decrease "saves an average daily commuter $1,500 per year".

"Lower-income New Yorkers will see even more savings: a 50% discount after the 10th toll of the month. If it's after 9pm, the toll will be reduced further."

Not everyone agrees with Hochul's about-turn.

Transportation and Infrastructure Committee chairman Sam Graves, and New Jersey governor Phil Murphy, are particularly unimpressed.

“President-elect Trump has made it clear that he does not support this congestion pricing scheme, and the rush to institute it before he can take office is a blatantly political move," Graves wrote in a statement.

"This calculated decision flies in the face of the message Americans just sent, and my committee will consider all options to conduct the necessary oversight of this issue as we move forward.”

Meanwhile, Murphy wrote: “I am firmly opposed to any attempt to force through a congestion pricing proposal in the final months of the Biden Administration. All of us need to listen to the message that voters across America sent last Tuesday, which is that the vast majority of Americans are experiencing severe economic strains and still feeling the effects of inflation. There could not be a worse time to impose a new $9 toll on individuals who are traveling into downtown Manhattan for work, school, or leisure."

On the X social media platform, Hochul wrote: "New York is moving forward with congestion pricing & a plan that strengthens public transit while putting commuters first."

"This lower toll allows us to accomplish all the goals of congestion pricing: modern signals, the Second Avenue subway, new electric buses, elevators, improvements for @MetroNorth [Metro-North Railroad] & @LIRR [Long Island Rail Road], less gridlock, cleaner air - all while lowering costs for New Yorkers."

Hochul added: "Our plan funds the MTA, reduces congestion, & keeps millions of dollars in the pockets of commuters. I look forward to seeing it take effect this January."

Related Content

  • Mileage based charging offers secure future for funding
    August 10, 2016
    HNTB’s Matthew Click sets out why a move to mileage-based pricing is inevitable. Infrastructure is the most neglected yet the most critical engine of our society, and our continued indifference could lead to a dystopian future. Our roads, bridges and highways have been largely passed by in the digital age—marginalised in an era when funding is limited and stewardship of physical assets has given way to our preoccupation with technological innovation and data—the stuff of the virtual realm.
  • IBTTA, ITS America respond to Trump’s infrastructure plans
    March 1, 2017
    The International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (IBTTA) and ITS America have both responded positively to President Donald Trump’s address to Congress, where he outlined his administration’s priorities, including repairing and rebuilding America’s transportation infrastructure. Trump said he will ask lawmakers to approve legislation that would see a US$1 trillion investment in infrastructure, funded by a mix of direct federal investment and private financing, according to The Hill.
  • Road user charging - replacing the gas tax with a mileage based fee
    January 19, 2012
    Oregon Department of Transportation's James Whitty discusses his state's progress with VMT fee-based charging. Back in 2001, the state of Oregon stole a lead on the rest of the US when it decided to address the need to do something about the gas tax and its decreasing ability to fund highway construction and upkeep. Recognising that a dwindling pot of money could only shrink further as vehicles became more fuelefficient, Oregon's Legislative Assembly passed laws which led to the setting up, by the state's g
  • Dutch survey shows drivers are in favour of road user charging
    January 16, 2012
    'Keep it simple, stupid' is an oft-forgotten axiom but in terms of road user charging it is entirely appropriate. So says the ANWB's Ferry Smith. A couple of decades ago, it might have been largely true that the technology aspects of advanced road infrastructure were the main obstacles to deployment. However, 20 years or more of development have led to a situation where such 'obstacles' are often no more than a political fig-leaf. Area-wide Road User Charging (RUC) is a case in point; speak candidly to syst